Alexandre Deur:

Last paragrapher col 1 page 4: The deviation below 1.8 GeV2 is not
significant (and agrees with 2 of the parameterizations). Then why use 1.8
to say that we start to see duality? My feeling at reading that is that we
are influenced by the deuteron results and hence we are making a
subjective statement. It would be bad if the reviewer feels the same. He
may also ask us then how we explain the claim that E94010 has seen duality
on gamma1n at lower Q2 (Meziani et al) and we don't while the accuracy of
both experiments are similar.

Conclusion: Same comment about 1.8 GeV2.

-----------------

Dipangkar Dutta:

In page 4 right column first 2 lines. You mention that for both proton and
deutron the global duality was previously observed for Q^2 above 1.7 GeV^2 
and in the previous lines you mention that for neutron you see it at Q^2 
about 1.8 GeV^2. But in figure 2 it is clear that for 3He the duality sets 
in at a slightly higher Q^2, you should probably note that and say something 
about it.