I have trouble to analyze harp data with 0.5 velocity. Since the buffer problem the position information is missing, so I take a reconstruction for the index with the existed position information first(there still have some position information existed in the first steps), then I draw the picture with reconstructed index and peak. but seems it just moved to 70mm shown in reconstructed index and this is incorrect, it should be greater than 80mm(second picture of attachment). the difference of the total steps for each harp run before is larger than 0.5mm(sometimes 81.482155 sometimes 81.993134) so I can not easily resize it to 81.5.
recomstructed index VS peak
reconstructed index VS pos
harp raw data
IHA1H04.04112012_03:19:33