The beam energy is 5.784 (accel) or 5.754 (Tiefenback). Injector angle is -34.o, the 1/2 wave plate was OUT.
The laser frequency provided a bulk extraction from the GAs crystal, the polarization expected was therefor about 30-40%.
LG1 tripped at high HV and was therefore turned off.
runs | Dial angle | Calculated angle | chi2 | comments | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
angle | Polarization % | angle | Polarization % | |||
10101-10102 | 90.0 | - | 0.35uA | - | - | thr=130mV, raster ON |
10090-10095 | 23.0 | 32.7+/-0.3 | 19.0 | 31.8+/-0.3 | 90. | Large BCM asymmetry |
10096-10099 | 163.5 | 31.2+/-0.4 | 159.0 | 32.0+/-0.4 | 98. | |
Average | - | 32.0+/-0.3 | - | 31.9+/-0.3 | - | Av: 32.0+/-0.3 Dead time not included |
The BCM asymmetry was huge: -0.003, and the BCM correction was dramatically increasing the difference between coil + and coil - data.
The full information is given
here .
The final results:
Pz= 32.0 +/- 0.3(stat) +/- 3.0(syst-prelim) (1/2 wave plate OUT, -34.o Wien angle)
(dead time correction DONE, assumed to be about 0.3%)
The beam energy is 3.484 (accel) or 3.4786 (EP/Arc at 5 passes). Injector angle is 60.o and 45.o, the 1/2 wave plate was OUT.
LG1 tripped at high HV and was therefore turned off.
runs | Dial angle | Calculated angle | chi2 | comments | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
angle | Polarization % | angle | Polarization % | |||
10103-10105 | 23.0 | - | 0.33uA | - | - | thr=40mV, attenuator=107 slit=-1.0 |
10115-10116 | 90.0 | - | 0.33uA | WIEN filter=60o | - | thr=80mV, attenuator=107 slit=-1.0 |
10107-10114 | 23.0 | 76.2+/-0.25 | 18.3 | 73.9+/-0.25 | 13. | Large BCM asymmetry |
10117-10124 | 163.5 | 70.6+/-0.25 | 159.6 | 72.3+/-0.25 | 19. | |
Average | - | 73.4+/-0.2 | - | 73.1+/-0.2 | - | Av: 73.3+/-0.2 Dead time not included |
10125 | 163.5 | 66.7+/-1.6 | 0.13uA | - | - | BCM calibration |
10126 | 163.5 | -72.9+/-0.8 | 0.6uA | - | - | BCM calibration |
10127 | 163.5 | 71.4+/-0.6 | 1.18uA | - | - | BCM calibration |
10128 | 163.5 | -69.7+/-1.3 | 0.26uA | - | - | BCM calibration |
10129 | 163.5 | 57.6+/-1.5 | 0.06uA | - | - | Hall A laser OFF, cross-talk from Halls C&B |
10130 | 163.5 | -61.4+/-1.4 | 0.06uA | - | - | Hall A laser OFF, cross-talk from Halls C&B |
10131 | 163.5 | 56.0+/-1.9 | 0.06uA | - | - | Hall A laser OFF, cross-talk from Halls C&B |
10132 | 163.5 | -75.1+/-0.7 | 0.30uA | - | - | Attenuator=318 slit=16 |
10133 | 163.5 | 42.8+/-4.0 | 0.03uA | - | - | Hall A laser OFF, cross-talk from Halls C&B |
10134-10141 | 163.5 | 74.2+/-0.2 | - | - | 9. | |
10142-10143 | 163.5 | 77.2+/-0.5 | 0.25uA | WIEN filter=45o | - | BCM calibration |
10144-10145 | 163.5 | 59.5+/-5.5 | 0.03uA | - | - | Hall A laser OFF, cross-talk from Halls C&B |
10146-10147 | 163.5 | 77.6+/-1.0 | 0.03uA | - | - | BCM calibration |
10148-10149 | 163.5 | 77.6+/-0.7 | 0.25uA | - | - | BCM calibration |
10150-10151 | 163.5 | 77.3+/-0.5 | 1.35uA | - | - | BCM calibration |
10152-10153 | 163.5 | 77.3+/-0.7 | 0.46uA | - | - | BCM calibration |
10162-10163 | 90.0 | - | 0.3uA | - | - | thr=80mV, attenuator=318 slit=16 |
10165-10172 | 23.0 | 82.1+/-0.25 | 17.8 | 79.4+/-0.25 | 30. | |
10154-10161 | 163.5 | 78.1+/-0.25 | 159.2 | 80.1+/-0.25 | 15. | |
Average | - | 80.1+/-0.25 | - | 79.7+/-0.2 | - | Av: 79.9+/-0.2 Dead time not included |
10181-10182 | 90.0 | - | 0.3uA | WIEN filter=60o | - | thr=80mV, attenuator=318 slit=16 |
10173-10180 | 23.0 | 80.2+/-0.25 | 17.9 | 77.5+/-0.25 | 9. | |
10183-10190 | 163.5 | 73.3+/-0.25 | 159.2 | 75.3+/-0.25 | 9. | |
Average | - | 76.8+/-0.2 | - | 76.4+/-0.2 | - | Av: 76.6+/-0.2 Dead time not included |
The BCM asymmetry was huge and very different: 0.0008-0.006
The full information is given
here .
The plot is given
here .
The final results:
Pz= 76.6 +/- 0.2(stat) +/- 3.0(syst-prelim) (1/2 wave plate OUT, 60.o Wien angle)
The beam energy is 3.4786 (arc, ep). Injector angle is 60.4.o, the 1/2 wave plate was OUT.
LG1 tripped at high HV and was therefore turned off.
Mott: -73.4+/-1.3 (see ELOG)
runs | Dial angle | Calculated angle | chi2 | comments | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
angle | Polarization % | angle | Polarization % | |||
10202-10203 | 90.0 | - | 0.28uA | - | - | thr=80mV, raster ON |
10194-10201 | 23.0 | 81.6+/-0.3 | 18.5 | 79.2+/-0.3 | 1.0 | Large BCM asymmetry |
10204-10211 | 163.5 | 75.1+/-0.3 | 160.0 | 76.6+/-0.3 | 3.1 | |
Average | - | 78.3+/-0.2 | - | 77.9+/-0.3 | - | Av: 78.13+/-0.2 Dead time not included |
The BCM asymmetry was huge: -0.006. Slit=15.5, Laser attenuator=340
The full information is given
here .
The plot is given
here .
The final results:
Pz= 78.13 +/- 0.2(stat) +/- 3.0(syst-prelim) (1/2 wave plate OUT, 60.4o Wien angle)
(dead time correction DONE, assumed to be about 0.3%)
The beam energy is 4.056 (arc, ep). Injector angle is 75.2.o, the 1/2 wave plate was OUT.
Problems with DAQ - Helicity signal in TIR is messed up. Helicity in ADC is used. Helicity 1-st sychro is messed up.
runs | Dial angle | Calculated angle | chi2 | comments | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
angle | Polarization % | angle | Polarization % | |||
10305-10306 | 90.0 | - | 0.28uA | - | - | thr=120mV, raster ON |
10301-10304 | 23.0 | 81.3+/-0.5 | 19.0 | 79.1+/-0.5 | 1.3 | |
10307-10310 | 163.5 | 76.7+/-0.5 | 160.5 | 78.0+/-0.5 | 1.5 | |
Average | - | 78.9+/-0.4 | - | 78.5+/-0.4 | - | Av: 78.8+/-0.4 Dead time not included |
The full information is given
here .
The plot is given
here .
The final results:
Pz= 78.7 +/- 0.4(stat) +/- 3.0(syst-prelim) (1/2 wave plate OUT, 75.2o Wien angle)
(dead time correction NOT DONE)
The beam energy is 2.056 (arc, ep). Injector angle is -30.o, the 1/2 wave plate was OUT.
At the beginning we had problems with DAQ - the ADC trigger (#1) was running spuriously with no gate signal. Also, as a week before, the input signals in the TRI (trigger module) were wrong. Plugging/unplugging the ECL cables fixed the problem... The input#8 was moved to a different NIM-ECL module.
Dipole scan shows that the dipole is close to the optimum see the plot .
runs | Dial angle | Calculated angle | chi2 | comments | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
angle | Polarization % | angle | Polarization % | |||
10351-10352 | 90.0 | - | 0.28uA | - | - | thr=240mV, raster ON |
10345-10350 | 23.0 | -84.6+/-0.4 | 18.4 | -82.1+/-0.4 | 2.5 | |
10352-10358 | 163.5 | -84.4+/-0.4 | 160.0 | -86.1+/-0.4 | 1.0 | |
Average | - | -84.5+/-0.3 | - | -84.1+/-0.3 | - | Av: -84.3+/-0.2 Dead time not included |
The full information is given
here .
The plot is given
here .
The final results:
Pz=-84.3 +/- 0.2(stat) +/- 3.0(syst-prelim) (1/2 wave plate OUT, -30.0o Wien angle)
(dead time correction NOT DONE)
The beam energy is 2.056 (arc, ep). Injector angle is -30.o, the 1/2 wave plate was OUT.
runs | Dial angle | Calculated angle | chi2 | comments | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
angle | Polarization % | angle | Polarization % | |||
10368-10369 | 90.0 | - | 0.28uA | - | - | thr=240mV, raster ON |
10362-10367 | 22.5 | -79.3+/-0.4 | 17.9 | -77.0+/-0.4 | 1.3 | |
10370-10375 | 163.5 | -76.0+/-0.3 | 160.9 | -77.1+/-0.3 | 0.9 | |
Average | - | -77.7+/-0.2 | - | -77.1+/-0.2 | - | Av: -77.4+/-0.2 Dead time not included |
10376-10377 | 163.5 | -75.3+/-0.3 | 0.88uA | - | 0.9 | |
10378-10381 | 163.5 | -76.3+/-0.3 | 0.46uA | - | 0.9 |
The full information is given
here .
The plot is given
here .
For the dead-time correction measurements were done at 0.2, 0.46 and 0.95µA (see the plot ). Extrapolation to zero beam current would give a correction of 0.33±0.05% absolute, or 0.41±0.06% relative to the beam polarization.
The final results:
The beam energy is 2.056 (arc, ep). Injector angle is -30.o, the 1/2 wave plate was OUT.
runs | Dial angle | Calculated angle | chi2 | comments | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
angle | Polarization % | angle | Polarization % | |||
10393-10394 | 90.0 | - | 0.28uA | - | - | thr=240mV, raster ON |
10385-10393 | 22.5 | -77.8+/-0.3 | 18.8 | -75.9+/-0.3 | 3.1 | |
10395-10400 | 163.5 | -74.2+/-0.3 | 161.0 | -75.2+/-0.3 | 4.0 | |
Average | - | -76.0+/-0.2 | - | -75.6+/-0.2 | - | Av: -75.8+/-0.2 Dead time not included |
10401 | 163.5 | . | . | - | . | BCM calibration: 0,0.48µA,1.0µA |
10402 | none | . | - | . | . | no target BG at 0,4.8,19.4µA |
The full information is given
here .
The plot is given
here .
The final results:
Pz=-75.8 +/- 0.2(stat) +/- 3.0(syst-prelim) (1/2 wave plate OUT, -30.0o Wien angle)
(dead time correction NOT DONE)