Run type: 1 - measurement in point, 2 - transverse scan, 3 - longitudinal scan
The beam energy is 1076MeV(accel), 510MeV(linac), 57.375MeV(injector).
Injector angle is 36.703o, the 1/2 wave plate was OUT.
Injector laser attenuation=140, Slit=16.4. Fast raster was ON.
Runs | Target | Type | T.Pos. | Encoder | BOP | Polarization % | Chi2 | Comments |
12705-12708 | 5 | 1 | 0.0 | 1.014/1.385 | 8.0 | 65.97+/-0.25 | 0.93 | B.cur=0.5uAmp, Thr=240mV |
12709-12710 | 4 | 1 | 0.0 | 1.660/1.385 | 8.0 | 67.55+/-0.34 | 0.01 | - |
12711-12712 | 3 | 1 | 0.0 | 2.303/1.385 | 8.0 | 66.29+/-0.29 | 0.01 | - |
12713-12714 | 3 | 1 | 0.0 | 2.303/1.385 | 8.0 | 66.34+/-0.37 | 15.88 | B.cur=0.3uAmp |
12715-12716 | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 2.933/1.385 | 8.0 | 66.12+/-0.35 | 1.73 | B.cur=0.16uAmp |
Average | 2,3,4,5 | 1 | 0.0 | - | 8.0 | 66.38+/-0.11 | 3.69 | - |
The table with detailed information is given
here .
The final results:
Pz= 66.38 +/- 0.11(stat) +/- 2.0(syst-prelim) (dead time correction is not included)
The beam energy is 1193MeV(accel), 565MeV(linac), 63.562MeV(injector). Injector angle is -40.203o, the 1/2 wave plate was IN.
Injector laser attenuation=83, Slit=17.7. Fast raster was OFF.
Runs | Target | Type | T.Pos. | Encoder | BOP | Polarization % | Chi2 | Comments |
12770-12771 | 5 | 1 | 0.0 | 1.026/1.385 | 8.0 | -66.59+/-0.41 | 1.93 | B.cur=0.5uAmp, Thr=240mV |
12772-12773 | 4 | 1 | 0.0 | 1.658/1.385 | 8.0 | -67.69+/-0.41 | 4.73 | - |
12774-12775 | 3 | 1 | 0.0 | 2.290/1.385 | 8.0 | -66.09+/-0.35 | 2.20 | B.cur=0.3uAmp |
12776-12777 | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 2.930/1.385 | 8.0 | -66.54+/-0.34 | 7.17 | B.cur=0.3uAmp |
Average | 2,3,4,5 | 1 | 0.0 | - | 8.0 | -66.65+/-0.19 | 3.57 | - |
The table with detailed information is given
here .
The final results:
Pz= -66.65 +/- 0.19(stat) +/- 2.0(syst-prelim) (dead time correction is not included)
The beam energy is 1193MeV(accel), 555MeV(linac), 63.562MeV(injector). Injector angle is -33.73o, the 1/2 wave plate was IN.
Injector laser attenuation=80, Slit=-0.98?. Fast raster was OFF.
Runs | Target | Type | T.Pos. | Encoder | BOP | Polarization % | Chi2 | Comments |
12784-12785 | 5 | 1 | 0.0 | 1.026/1.394 | 8.0 | -67.85+/-0.37 | 1.14 | B.cur=0.5uAmp, Thr=240mV |
12786-12789 | 4 | 1 | 0.0 | 1.656/1.389 | 8.0 | -68.58+/-0.37 | 0.51 | - |
12790-12791 | 3 | 1 | 0.0 | 2.289/1.389 | 8.0 | -67.20+/-0.31 | 0.84 | - |
12792-12793 | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 2.930/1.387 | 8.0 | -67.93+/-0.35 | 3.35 | - |
Average | 2,3,4,5 | 1 | 0.0 | - | 8.0 | -67.95+/-0.16 | 1.85 | - |
The table with detailed information is given
here .
The final results:
Pz= -67.95 +/- 0.16(stat) +/- 2.0(syst-prelim) (dead time correction is not included)
The beam energy is 1193MeV(accel), 555MeV(linac), 63.562MeV(injector). Injector angle is -13.73o, the 1/2 wave plate was IN.
Injector laser attenuation=120, Slit=15.465. Fast raster was ON.
Runs | Target | Type | T.Pos. | Encoder | BOP | Polarization % | Chi2 | Comments |
12800-12801 | 5 | 1 | 0.0 | 1.026/1.394 | 8.0 | -83.51+/-0.45 | 0.29 | B.cur=0.4uAmp, Thr=240mV |
12802-12803 | 4 | 1 | 0.0 | 1.656/1.398 | 8.0 | -83.38+/-0.40 | 3.28 | - |
12804-12805 | 3 | 1 | 0.0 | 2.286/1.398 | 8.0 | -82.12+/-0.32 | 0.45 | - |
12806-12807 | 3 | 1 | 0.0 | 2.286/1.398 | 8.0 | - | - | Bleedthrough from Hall C |
12808-12809 | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 2.930/1.392 | 8.0 | -83.93+/-0.34 | 3.06 | B.cur=0.17uAmp |
Average | 2,3,4,5 | 1 | 0.0 | - | 8.0 | -83.05+/-0.18 | 2.28 | - |
Bleedthrough from Hall C 0.4uAmp/73uAmp(Hall C) ~0.5*10-3
The table with detailed information is given
here .
The final results:
Pz= -83.05 +/- 0.18(stat) +/- 2.0(syst-prelim) (dead time correction is not included)
Beam spot moving
The beam energy is 1193MeV(accel), 555MeV(linac), 63.562MeV(injector). Injector angle is -13.536o, the 1/2 wave plate was IN.
Injector laser attenuation=79, Slit=19.6. Fast raster was ON.
Runs | Target | Type | T.Pos. | Encoder | BOP | Polarization % | Chi2 | Comments |
12811-12812 | 5 | 1 | 0.0 | 1.026/1.389 | 8.0 | -85.35+/-0.45 | 0.29 | B.cur=0.5uAmp, Thr=250mV |
12813 | 4 | 1 | 0.0 | 1.656/1.389 | 8.0 | -84.72+/-0.55 | - | - |
12814 | 4 | 1 | 0.0 | 1.656/1.389 | 8.0 | - | - | 2 hours accelerator down |
- | 4 | 1 | 0.0 | 1.656/1.389 | 8.0 | - | - | Target was moved out |
12815-12816 | 4 | 1 | 0.0 | 1.656/1.389 | 8.0 | -82.34+/-0.40 | 1.29 | - |
12817-12818 | 3 | 1 | 0.0 | 2.286/1.389 | 8.0 | -83.70+/-0.32 | 1.50 | - |
12819-12820 | 3 | 1 | 0.0 | 2.286/1.389 | 8.0 | -83.90+/-0.48 | 1.07 | B.cur=0.22uAmp |
12821-12822 | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 2.926/1.389 | 8.0 | -83.50+/-0.35 | 0.90 | B.cur=0.22uAmp |
12823-12824 | 5 | 1 | 0.0 | 1.030/1.389 | 8.0 | -84.15+/-0.41 | 0.22 | B.cur=0.5uAmp |
12825 | 5 | 1 | 0.0 | 1.030/1.389 | 8.0 | - | - | Laser OFF. Beam spot moving |
12826-12827 | 5 | 1 | 0.0 | 1.028/1.389 | 8.0 | -83.76+/-0.42 | 0.20 | B.cur=0.5uAmp |
12828 | 4 | 1 | 0.0 | 1.655/1.389 | 8.0 | -82.83+/-0.42 | - | - |
12829-12830 | 4 | 1 | 0.0 | 1.656/1.389 | 8.0 | - | - | Wrong quads settings |
Average | 2,3,4,5 | 1 | 0.0 | - | 8.0 | -83.68+/-0.13 | 5.28 | Before beam spot moving |
Average | 4,5 | 1 | 0.0 | - | 8.0 | -83.76+/-0.30 | 0.10 | After beam spot moving |
The table with detailed information is given
here .
The final results:
Before beam spot moving: Pz= -83.68 +/- 0.13(stat) +/- 2.0(syst-prelim) (dead time correction is not included)
After beam spot moving: Pz= -83.76 +/- 0.30(stat) +/- 2.0(syst-prelim) (dead time correction is not included)
E-06-010: Transversity experiment
The beam energy is 1232MeV (accel) 583.5MeV(linac).
Injector angle is 0.2o, the 1/2 wave plate was OUT.
Injector laser attenuation=80, Slit=16.8. Fast raster was ON.
Runs | Target | Type | T.Pos. | Encoder | BOP | Polarization % | Chi2 | Comments |
12853-12857 | 5 | 1 | 0.0 | 1.032/1.392 | 8.0 | 89.55+/-0.36 | 1.46 | B.cur=0.33uAmp, Thr=250mV |
12858-12861 | 4 | 1 | 0.0 | 1.663/1.392 | 8.0 | 87.74+/-0.42 | 1.89 | B.cur=0.32uAmp |
12862-12865 | 3 | 1 | 0.0 | 2.293/1.397 | 8.0 | 89.22+/-0.42 | 0.26 | B.cur=0.31uAmp |
12866-12869 | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 2.921/1.390 | 8.0 | 86.88+/-0.30 | 2.49 | B.cur=0.32uAmp |
12870-12873 | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 2.921/1.392 | 8.0 | 87.70+/-0.39 | 0.17 | B.cur=0.2uAmp |
Average | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 2.921/1.392 | 8.0 | 87.18+/-0.24 | 0.17 | 12866-12873 |
Average | 4,5 | 1 | - | - | - | 88.72+/-0.27 | 1.89 | - |
Average | 2,3,4,5 | 1 | - | - | - | 88.09+/-0.17 | 1.89 | - |
The table with detailed information is given
here .
For additional information see halog entry 246331
For the beam energy fluctuation see Chart .
The final results:
Pz= (88.09 +/- 0.17(stat) +/- 1.7(syst))%
The plot is given
here .
The beam energy is 5904MeV(accel), 583.5MeV(linac), 65.6437MeV(injector).
Injector angle is 31.1993o, the 1/2 wave plate was IN.
Injector Laser attenuation=85, Slit=17. Fast raster was ON.
Runs | Target | Type | T.Pos. | Encoder | BOP | Polarization % | Chi2 | Cor.Polar. % | Chi2 | Comments |
12875-12876 | 5 | 1 | 0.0 | 1.033/1.392 | 8.0 | HV adjustment | - | - | - | B.cur=0.52uAmp, Thr=100mV |
12877-12880 | 5 | 1 | 0.0 | 1.033/1.392 | 8.0 | -75.42+/-0.27 | 1.43 | -80.03 | 3.16 | Threshold=150mV |
12881-12884 | 4 | 1 | 0.0 | 1.656/1.387 | 8.0 | -73.98+/-0.29 | 0.14 | -78.56 | 0.55 | B.cur=0.5uAmp |
12885-12888 | 3 | 1 | 0.0 | 2.288/1.394 | 8.0 | -74.42+/-0.26 | 1.13 | -78.47 | 1.64 | B.cur=0.47uAmp |
12889-12892 | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 2.918/1.392 | 8.0 | -74.86+/-0.17 | 0.42 | -79.61 | 1.19 | B.cur=0.48uAmp |
12893-12896 | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 2.918/1.392 | 8.0 | -75.22+/-0.20 | 1.03 | -79.99 | - | B.cur=0.31uAmp |
Average | 2 | 1 | - | - | - | -75.01+/-0.13 | 1.58 | -79.77 | 2.93 | - |
Average | 4,5 | 1 | - | - | - | -84.75+/-0.19 | 1.89 | -79.35 | - | |
Average | 2,3,4,5 | 1 | - | - | - | -74.85+/-0.10 | 1.70 | -79.47 | 2.62 | - |
The final results:
Pz=(-79.47 +/- 0.10(stat) +/- 2.0(syst))%
The plot is given
here .
The beam energy is 5904MeV(accel), 583.5MeV(linac), 65.6437MeV(injector).
Injector angle is 31.1993o, the 1/2 wave plate was IN.
Injector Laser attenuation=109, Slit=15.2. Fast raster was ON.
Runs | Target | Type | T.Pos. | Encoder | BOP | Polarization % | Chi2 | Cor.Polar. % | Chi2 | Comments |
12899-12902 | 5 | 1 | 0.0 | 1.035/1.390 | 8.0 | -76.57+/-0.34 | 6.47 | -80.30 | 3.26 | B.cur=0.48uAmp Thr=150mV |
12903-12906 | 4 | 1 | 0.0 | 1.666/1.392 | 8.0 | -76.08+/-0.28 | 0.75 | -79.28 | 1.71 | B.cur=0.47uAmp Thr=150mV |
12907-12910 | 3 | 1 | 0.0 | 2.296/1.397 | 8.0 | -73.97+/-0.27 | 9.08 | -78.73 | 1.66 | B.cur=0.48uAmp Thr=150mV |
12911-12914 | 3 | 1 | 0.0 | 2.291/1.392 | 8.0 | -72.78+/-0.27 | 1.43 | -78.69 | 3.31 | B.cur=0.45uAmp Thr=250mV |
12915-12918 | 5 | 1 | 0.0 | 1.038/1.390 | 8.0 | -74.19+/-0.35 | 3.14 | -80.07 | 1.08 | B.cur=0.45uAmp Thr=250mV |
12919-12922 | 5 | 1 | 0.0 | 1.038/1.390 | 8.0 | -74.31+/-0.42 | 2.16 | -80.16 | 2.95 | B.cur=0.43uAmp Thr=350mV |
12923-12926 | 5 | 1 | 0.0 | 1.038/1.390 | 8.0 | -73.87+/-0.31 | 1.21 | -80.09 | 1.17 | B.cur=0.45uAmp Thr=150mV |
12927-12929 | 5 | 1 | 0.0 | 1.033/1.397 | 8.0 | -73.03+/-0.39 | 2.62 | -79.24 | 2.03 | B.cur=0.43uAmp Thr=150mV |
12930-12933 | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 2.921/1.392 | 8.0 | -73.01+/-0.20 | 2.84 | -79.81 | 2.74 | B.cur=0.43uAmp Thr=250mV |
Average | 5 | 1 | 0.0 | 2.921/1.392 | 8.0 | -74.48+/-0.16 | 2.84 | -80.29 | 2.74 | B.cur=0.43uAmp Thr=250mV |
Average | 3 | 1 | 0.0 | 2.921/1.392 | 8.0 | -73.38+/-0.19 | 2.84 | -78.71 | 2.74 | B.cur=0.43uAmp Thr=250mV |
Average | 4,5 | 1 | 0.0 | 2.921/1.392 | 8.0 | -74.87+/-0.14 | 2.84 | -80.04 | 2.74 | - |
Average | 2,3,4,5 | 1 | - | - | - | -74.03+/-0.10 | 7.11 | -79.63 | 2.91 | - |
The table with detailed information is given
here .
For additional information see halog entry 249426
For the beam energy fluctuation see Chart .
Correction of the Moller results on a beam energy fluctuation (HALLA:p) was done run-by-run.
Run-by-run information see in table an on plot .
The final results:
Pz=(-79.63 +/- 0.10(stat) +/- 2.0(syst))%
The plot is given
here .
The beam energy is 5904MeV(accel), 583.5MeV(linac), 65.6437MeV(injector).
Injector angle is 31.1993o, the 1/2 wave plate was IN.
Injector Laser attenuation=103, Slit=15.75. Fast raster was ON.
Runs | Target | Type | T.Pos. | Encoder | BOP | Polarization % | Chi2 | Cor.Polar. % | Chi2 | Comments |
12935-12938 | 5 | 1 | 0.0 | 1.039/1.390 | 8.0 | -74.24+/-0.33 | 0.93 | -77.51 | 5.68 | B.cur=0.41uAmp Thr=50mV |
12939-12942 | 5 | 1 | 0.0 | 1.039/1.390 | 8.0 | -75.78+/-0.33 | 1.23 | -78.58 | 2.18 | Thr=150mV |
12943-12946 | 5 | 1 | 0.0 | 1.039/1.390 | 8.0 | -74.50+/-0.37 | 0.23 | -77.47 | 0.87 | Thr=300mV |
12947 | 5 | 1 | 0.0 | 1.039/1.390 | 8.0 | - | - | - | - | Hall A laser OFF |
12948 | 5 | 1 | 0.0 | 1.039/1.390 | 8.0 | -70.25+/-0.34 | - | -74.75 | - | Thr=400mV |
12949-12952 | 5 | 1 | 0.0 | 1.039/1.390 | 8.0 | -74.74+/-0.40 | 1.34 | -78.06 | 0.63 | Thr=350mV |
12954-12955 | 5 | 1 | 0.0 | 1.039/1.390 | 8.0 | -73.28+/-0.55 | 1.58 | -74.65 | 0.50 | Thr=300mV |
12956 | 5 | 1 | 0.0 | 1.039/1.390 | 8.0 | - | - | - | - | Delay Ch4,5 18->14 Thr=300mV |
Average | 5 | 1 | 0.0 | 1.039/1.390 | 8.0 | -74.46+/-0.20 | 1.06 | -77.30 | 4.27 | Thr=300 |
12957-12960 | 4 | 1 | 0.0 | 1.661/1.392 | 8.0 | -73.37+/-0.38 | 0.82 | -76.15 | 2.33 | Delay back to 18 Thr=300mV |
12961-12964 | 3 | 1 | 0.0 | 2.291/1.392 | 8.0 | -73.55+/-0.33 | 2.97 | -75.57 | 1.00 | Thr=300mV |
12965-12968 | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 2.923/1.389 | 8.0 | -74.32+/-0.23 | 0.44 | -77.47 | 0.17 | Thr=300mV |
Average | 4,5 | 1 | 0.0 | 2.921/1.392 | 8.0 | -74.22+/-0.18 | - | -77.05 | 2.74 | - |
Average | 2,3,4,5 | 1 | - | - | - | -74.15+/-0.13 | 1.60 | -76.94 | 4.24 | Thr=300 |
The table with detailed information is given
here .
Several systematic studies were done to look for the jumps in polarization observed in the previous measurement, which later turned out
to be made in the dispersive mode of the beam.
For additional information see halog entry 249874
For the beam energy fluctuation see Chart .
Correction of the Moller results on a beam energy fluctuation (HALLA:p) was done run-by-run.
Run-by-run information see in table an on plot .
The final results:
Pz=(-76.94 +/- 0.13(stat) +/- 2.0(syst))%
The plot is given
here .
The beam energy is 5904MeV(accel), 583.5MeV(linac), 65.6437MeV(injector).
Injector angle is 31.1993o, the 1/2 wave plate was OUT.
Injector Laser attenuation=170, Slit=15.5. Fast raster was OFF.
Runs | Target | Type | T.Pos. | Encoder | BOP | Polarization % | Chi2 | Cor.Polar. % | Chi2 | Comments |
12971-12974 | 5 | 1 | 0.0 | 1.031/1.392 | 8.0 | 81.22+/-0.36 | 0.89 | 79.92 | 0.46 | B.cur=0.44uAmp Thr=300mV |
12975-12980 | 4 | 1 | 0.0 | 1.661/1.394 | 8.0 | 81.34+/-0.27 | 0.52 | 79.88 | 0.28 | B.cur=0.45uAmp |
12981-12984 | 3 | 1 | 0.0 | 2.288/1.394 | 8.0 | 78.08+/-0.30 | 0.32 | 76.56 | 1.53 | B.cur=0.45uAmp |
12985-12988 | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 2.923/1.390 | 8.0 | 80.67+/-0.19 | 0.92 | 77.41 | 0.68 | B.cur=0.43uAmp |
12989-12990 | 5 | 1 | 0.0 | 1.030/1.393 | 8.0 | 81.23+/-0.52 | 0.33 | 79.11 | 0.01 | B.cur=0.44uAmp |
12991-12994 | 3 | 1 | 0.0 | 2.291/1.390 | 8.0 | 78.65+/-0.30 | 1.59 | 77.80 | 1.50 | B.cur=0.67uAmp |
12995-12996 | 5 | 1 | 0.0 | 1.035/1.390 | 8.0 | 80.04+/-0.42 | 0.01 | 78.96 | 0.01 | B.cur=0.65uAmp |
Average | 3 | 1 | - | - | - | 78.08+/-0.21 | 1.05 | 76.62 | 0.57 | - |
Average | 5 | 1 | - | - | - | 80.79+/-0.24 | 1.05 | 79.38 | 0.57 | - |
Average | 4,5 | 1 | - | - | - | 81.03+/-0.18 | 1.05 | 79.60 | 0.57 | - |
Average | 2,3,4,5 | 1 | - | - | - | 80.26+/-0.11 | 4.74 | 78.03 | 6.05 | - |
The table with detailed information is given
here .
The beam strongly zig-zagged in Y (see entry 251185 ).
For the beam energy fluctuation see Chart1 and Chart2 .
The energy lock on Hall C, pulsed, was used. At 0.44 ľA in Hall A the "HALLA:p" and "ARC9:p"
energy measurement is not very reliable and depends on the beam current (see the strip chart). On the other hand, the ARC-2 measurement
"ARC2:p" measurement was stable.
The regular value of "HALLA:p" obtained at higher current with the Hall A energy lock is 5892 MeV.
For additional information see halog entry 249874 .
Correction of the Moller results on a beam energy fluctuation (HALLA:p) was done run-by-run. Run-by-run information see in table an on plot .
The final results:
Pz=(78.03 +/- 0.11(stat) +/- 2.0(syst))%
The plot is given
here .
The beam energy is 5904MeV(accel), 583.5MeV(linac), 65.6437MeV(injector).
Injector angle is 31.1993o, the 1/2 wave plate was OUT.
Injector Laser attenuation=300, Slit=15.75. Fast raster was ON.
Runs | Target | Type | T.Pos. | Encoder | BOP | Polarization % | Chi2 | Cor.Polar. % | Chi2 | Comments |
13001-13004 | 5 | 1 | 0.0 | 1.035/1.394 | 8.0 | 53.68+/-0.30 | 0.15 | 53.87 | 0.22 | B.cur=0.65uAmp Thr=300mV |
13005-13008 | 4 | 1 | 0.0 | 1.661/1.392 | 8.0 | 53.98+/-0.27 | 0.35 | 54.24 | 0.60 | B.cur=0.65uAmp |
13009 | 4 | 1 | 0.0 | 1.661/1.394 | 8.0 | - | - | Hall A laser OFF | ||
13010-13013 | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 2.918/1.397 | 8.0 | 53.79+/-0.13 | 0.76 | 54.26 | 1.16 | B.cur=0.5uAmp |
Average | 4,5 | 1 | - | - | - | 53.85+/-0.20 | 0.24 | 54.07 | 0.40 | - |
Average | 2,4,5 | 1 | - | - | - | 53.81+/-0.11 | 0.44 | 54.10 | 0.60 | - |
The table with detailed information is given
here .
The beam tune: the quads were changed, then the beam was sent. It was at Y=1.5mm in 1H01,4A and 4B.
The beam DID NOT move after the quad change! Perhaps 1.5 mm is not much at this energy.
The energy lock on Hall C, pulsed, was used.
For the beam energy fluctuation see Chart
For additional information see halog entry 252564 .
Correction of the Moller results on a beam energy fluctuation (HALLA:p) was done run-by-run. Run-by-run information see in table an on plot .
The final results:
Pz=(54.10 +/- 0.11(stat) +/- 2.0(syst))%
Low polarization was explained by injector problem.
The plot is given
here .
The beam energy is 5904MeV(accel), 583.5MeV(linac), 65.6437MeV(injector).
Injector angle is 31.1993o, the 1/2 wave plate was OUT.
Injector Laser attenuation=300, Slit=15.8. Fast raster was ON.
Runs | Target | Type | T.Pos. | Encoder | BOP | Polarization % | Chi2 | Cor.Polar. % | Chi2 | Comments |
13015-13018 | 5 | 1 | 0.0 | 1.035/1.397 | 8.0 | 79.47+/-0.27 | 2.57 | 80.08 | 2.61 | Thr=300mV B.cur=0.48uAmp |
13019-13022 | 4 | 1 | 0.0 | 1.661/1.397 | 8.0 | 79.24+/-0.31 | 1.79 | 79.85 | 1.81 | B.cur=0.48uAmp |
13023-13026 | 3 | 1 | 0.0 | 2.296/1.392 | 8.0 | 77.41+/-0.26 | 2.11 | 77.40 | 73.79 | B.cur=0.48uAmp |
13027-13030 | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 2.921/1.392 | 8.0 | 79.08+/-0.17 | 3.55 | 79.69 | 1.92 | B.cur=0.48uAmp |
13031-13034 | 5 | 1 | 0.0 | 1.040/1.390 | 8.0 | 78.71+/-0.27 | 1.04 | 78.95 | 0.62 | B.cur=0.78uAmp |
Average | 5 | 1 | 0.0 | 1.040/1.390 | 8.0 | 78.78+/-0.19 | 1.04 | 79.21 | 0.62 | B.cur=0.78uAmp |
Average | 4,5 | 1 | - | - | - | 78.91+/-0.16 | 1.89 | 79.38 | 0.23 | - |
Average | 2,3,4,5 | 1 | - | - | - | 78.65+/-0.10 | 1.89 | 79.08 | 0.23 | - |
The table with detailed information is given
here .
The energy lock on Hall C, pulsed, was used.
For the beam energy fluctuation see Chart .
For additional information see halog entry 252767 .
The bean energy fluctuation can not be corrected for Tragets 2 and 3 (runs 13023-13030) due to that the targets 2 and 3 are excluded from the average.
Correction of the Moller results on a beam energy fluctuation (HALLA:p) was done run-by-run. Run-by-run information see in table an on plot .
The final results:
Pz=(79.08 +/- 0.10(stat) +/- 2.0(syst))%
The plot is given
here .
The beam energy is 5904MeV(accel), 583.5MeV(linac), 65.6437MeV(injector).
Injector angle is 31.1993o, the 1/2 wave plate was IN.
Injector Laser attenuation=120, Slit=15.5. Fast raster was ON.
Runs | Target | Type | T.Pos. | Encoder | BOP | Polarization % | Chi2 | Cor.Polar. % | Chi2 | Comments |
13039-13042 | 5 | 1 | 0.0 | 1.031/1.390 | 8.0 | -79.99+/-0.36 | 1.07 | -78.90 | 0.94 | Thr=300mV B.cur=0.45uAmp |
13043-13046 | 4 | 1 | 0.0 | 1.656/1.390 | 8.0 | -79.31+/-0.36 | 1.50 | -78.09 | 1.27 | B.cur=0.45uAmp |
13047-13050 | 3 | 1 | 0.0 | 2.288/1.397 | 8.0 | -78.62+/-0.33 | 1.49 | -77.47 | 1.32 | B.cur=0.45uAmp |
13051-13052 | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 2.911/1.392 | 8.0 | -80.09+/-0.24 | 0.67 | -79.03 | 0.68 | B.cur=0.45uAmp |
Average | 4,5 | 1 | - | - | - | -79.65+/-0.25 | 1.31 | -78.50 | 1.30 | - |
Average | 2,3,4,5 | 1 | - | - | - | -79.59+/-0.18 | 1.31 | -78.47 | 1.30 | - |
The table with detailed information is given
here .
For additional information see halog entry 253732 .
The energy lock on Hall C, pulsed, was used.
For the beam energy fluctuation see Chart .
Correction of the Moller results on a beam energy fluctuation (HALLA:p) was done run-by-run. Run-by-run information see in table an on plot .
The final results:
Pz=(-78.47 +/- 0.18(stat) +/- 2.0(syst))%
The plot is given
here .