The last couple weeks I spent working on a number of smaller projects.  First,
I have completed a set of calibrations for kinematic 4 and kinematic 2.  These
will be checked into CVS soon.

Next, it was proposed that I correct the coplanarity differences between runs
to hope that it fixes the calibration differences that we see between
kinematics.

Page 1: By shifting the vertical position of the spectrometer, the central
peak of the coplanarity plot shifts accordingly.  By doing a chi^2 fit on these
points I was able to determine a shift of 0.0144m was necessary to make the
coplanarity 0.

Page 2:  Coplanarity is centerd around 0 for this shfit

Page 3:  A recalibration was performed on kinematic 4.  The leading coefficient
changed from about 0.287 to 0.277

Page 4:  Coplanarity for kinematic 3 using this new calibration was roughly
centered.  The width for some reason is narrower.  There was no obvious
correllation that could explain it.

Page 5: Unfortunately, the peak is still off, though not as dramatically.  It 
is an improvement from the 50MeV from before

I've also been working on the background using the acceptance from times
outside of our region of interest.

Page 6:  Predictably, the pmiss_par background spectrum didn't change much.
This is due to the fact that we're still using a flat time spectrum sampling.

Page 7: There is a difference in the pmiss_perp background spectrum.  This is
due to changing the x and y acceptance (mostly reducing the acceptance in the
higher acceptance regions).

This still needs to be applied to the runs to determine the rates.

Finally, there is some issue where his yield ratios between neutrons and
protons do not agree with Rob's.  To be more precise, Rob's numbers are roughly
a factor of 0.7 ours.  I believe that this is mainly due to the fact that
Nilanga's numbers do not have any type of background correction on them while
Rob's does.  I'm in the process of fixing this and will report results as soon
as I get them.