Notes from Local Meeting on April 15, 2004
In attendance: David Armstrong, Hachemi Benaoum, Tim Holmstrom,
Bob Michaels, Lisa Kaufman, Kent Paschke, Ryan Snyder, Bryan Moffit
Plans for this weekend
- Hypernuclear plans to run with cryotarget this weekend. This
presents an opportunity for us to commission the lumi and test target
boiling.
- Our goals for this weekend are:
- test septum heating
- verify good signals from lumi, and quantify widths vs.
luminosity
- measure target boiling on 4cm, and possibly 15 cm cell
- Riad will submit a test plan for the 15 cm LH2 target.
We agree that to avoid a large impact on hypernuclear, we will keep
out plan short (1 hour or less). Dave Armstrong points out that, in addition
to several current setpoints, this test should include two raster settings.
This should be possible in a one hour test.
Analysis Log
The HAPLOG linked from the HAPPEX webpage
is the HAPPEX Analysis Log. We should use this to keep track of our
work during hypernuclear and pentaquark experiments, to avoid cluttering
up the HALOG.
Lumi pedestals (Hachemi)
- Beam lumi pedestals are all 3-5 channels, seen in a
1 hour run.
- Some double peaking, at a few ppm level, is visible in
some runs, but not in others. All helicity control signals have been
eliminated from this DAQ crate, so the double peaking must be
correlated with something else.
- Occasional periods occur in which the noise in some of the lumi
detectors becomes relatively large. This is the intermittent pickup which
has been seen in previous pedestal studies.
- Currently, the ground lead of the differential PMT signal for each
lumi detector is isolated using a 100 pF capacitor. It is pointed out
that if any other approach is to be tried, for example, using a large
resistor in place of the capacitor, action must be taken soon as beam
will be in the Hall on Friday.
- Bryan points out that the lumi HV settings are now recorded in
the start- and end-of-run logs in the HALOG.
Compton Commissioning
- Kees announced at Hall A meeting that the Compton would not
see beam during hypernuclear.
- There are 4 primary goals for the Compton commissioning
- Optimize beam spot, aspect, and position in Compton
- Scan master slit settings versus background.
- Phase trombone - the phase trombone should not modify
beam spot or aspect in the polarimeter, but this should be directly
verified by checking signal vs. background.
- The effect of the dithering magnets must be checked for the optics
configuration through the Compton.
Test Plans
Several test plans should be completed during
Hypernuclear.
- Dithering will be attempted for the first time.
- The effect of the phase trombone on helicity-correlated position
differences will be tested using the PZT, after accelerator completes
initial testing.
Laser Table
- Lisa summarized work on characterizing new cells
- One new cell, Sam, has been characterized. Birefringence
gradients have been observed to be as small as those seen in Arwen.
- Steering scans converge quickly. Few 10's of ppms expected from
steering in tunnel.
- Estimates of birefringence gradients at "geometric" (zero-steering),
scaled by expected analyzing power on cathode, lead to estimates as low
as 50 nm of position differences due to birefringence gradients.
- We are about to start modeling aspects of the expected tunnel
setup on the laser table.
- Ryan summarized work on imaging
- Imaging solution appears possible
- Started investigation of beam telescope ("expander") and
beam spot size.
- We will probably check effect of spot size on
birefringence-gradient induced position-differences.
Database
- Riad and Time haven't started yet, but there is
still a strong desire to see this done.
- Bryan points out that an sql client is needed on the adaq cluster, Tim
will need to consult Ole for this.
- Dave Armstrong advocates a mirror for the database, to increase
reliability.
DAQ
- Feedback
- Charge asymmetry feedback will be done with either the
IA cell (unlikely) or the PITA voltage (likely). panFFB will need to
be changed to be able to use either device.
- In order to achieve the necessary fine control
with the PITA voltage, it will be necessary to use the EPICS setpoint
as an offset from a constant which is near the quarterwave voltage.
Again, this probably requires a small change in panFFB.
- PZT feedback may also be used. The PZT motion induces a charge
asymmetry (always has, and the mechanism is completely not understood), so
it will likely be necessary to use a 3x3 matrix feedback for PZT changes.
This requires further modification of panFFB.
- Bryan will take the lead of preparing panFFB for feedback.
- Injector DAQ. 6 bpms presently readout, 9 will be desired eventually
(+ one bcm, one quad photodiode and a battery or two). One ADC will be used
for the BCM, and otherwise all bpms will be read out using the
V2F.scalers.
- ADC supply
- Bryan is now a "confident ADC-fixer". He has fixed
4 ADCs so far, each with a failure due to bad solder joints. He is
confident that he can track down and fix bad solder joints as they appear,
and it seems likely that more will appear over the next few months.
- Two voltage ADCs have been removed from the injector, and
will be used to readout the Cavity BPMs.
- Left HRS DAQ has been installed and configured. The full
4-crate DAQ has been run without problems.
- The sync monitor has been installed on the Right-HRS DAQ crate,
and all control signals except for MPS have been removed from that crate.
The sync monitor has not yet been installed on the Left-HRS crate.
Online Monitor
- Bryan's new online monitor, named PANGUIN (PAN GUI moNitor)
should be ready for release this weekend!
- There is a small problem with a memory leak from a flaw
in ROOT's handling of scatter plots (bug report submitted, problem
is being worked on). This is manageable, but will require periodic
restarts of PANGUIN
Cryotarget operator training
Dave will discuss
the requirements for cryotarget operator training with J.-P.
Training standards might be more strict than past runs due to
the CHL boost to the ESR.
Jeopardy
- Larry has told Dave that HAPPEX-He will be up for jeopardy if
it is not completed by the Fall'04 PAC. We had previously understood that
an experiment which had received a portion of its data was immune from
jeopardy, but this appears to not be the case.
- Presumably this applies to the HAPPEX-H run, as well.
- It may be that appearing on the schedule in the first half of '05 will
exempt these experiments from jeopardy, but this isn't clearly understood right
now.
Kent Paschke