User name sarty
Log entry time 17:35:25 on July25,2006
Entry number 175201
This entry is a followup to: 175200
keyword=Harp scan double-check of raster
As per Arun's suggestion - and Bob's halog the spot_L is not yet commissioned - we *did* now run a harp scan with the raster on (at its "10 x 7.5" MCC request setting - the same as we have the spot++ data logged in previous halog). The results can be found in harp scan file run 2233. That file gave baselines on Harp B of 6.5 mm x 6.5 mm, which is actually pretty darned close to the previously logged spot_L (spot++)! Bottom line for now: this raster size is good, and we're all set to go.