NEXT
Make New Entry,
Make Followup Entry
User name
Log entry time 18:52:37 on February 27, 2009
Entry number 263728
This entry is a followup to: 263715
keyword=Re: T8 charge asymmetry
Including the error, that number is (-218 +- 110) ppm. (Assuming I
didn't screw up the error calculation.)
So, still not zero, but only a couple std. dev. away for this data set.
Is the ~200 ppm asym consistent across many measurements?
Is this the same issue as Halog
252965?
A copy of this log entry has been emailed to: moffit, kalyan, jinhuang