Assuming rates of 1.1 Mhz @ 100 uA on each arm (from Dustin's simulations)
At 78 uA, Expected det rms ~ 5913 ppm/arm Expected diff (asym_n_det1-asym_n_det2) rms ~ 8364 {5913*sqrt(2)} Expected avg rms ~ 4181 {diff/2}
At 72 uA, Expected det rms ~ 6155 ppm/arm Expected diff (asym_n_det1-asym_n_det2) rms ~ 8703 Expected avg rms ~ 4352
At 60 uA, Expected det rms ~ 6742 ppm/arm Expected diff (asym_n_det1-asym_n_det2) rms ~ 9535 {6742*sqrt(2)} Expected avg rms ~ 4767 {diff/2}
At 50 uA, Expected det rms ~ 7385 ppm/arm Expected diff (asym_n_det1-asym_n_det2) rms ~ 10445 Expected avg rms ~ 5222
run # 11851 : 78 uA run # 11857 : 72/74 uA run # 11861 : 50 uA run # 11862 : 60 uA
cur: det1/det2/sum/diff 78: 5693, 5751, 4564, 7908 72/74: 5708, 5822, 4561, 8132 60: 6386, 6571, 5145, 9152 50: 7006, 6914, 5487, 9698
cur: lumi_x/c/sum/x-c 78: 1400, 1329, 1361,207 72/74: 1331, 1273, 1299, 163 60: 720, 681, 695, 190 50: 577, 553, 558, 182
run # 11855: MCC 11.0x8.5 (5.0x4.5 mm) ~ 70 uA run # 11856: MCC 7.7x8.0 (3.5x4.5 mm) ~ 77/78 uA run # 11857: MCC 7.7x6.0 (3.5x3.5 mm) ~ 72/74 uA
raster: det1/det2/sum/diff 5.0x4.5: 5817/5832/4576/8217 3.5x4.5: 5629/5829/4551/8103 3.5x3.5: 5708/5822/4561/8132
raster: lumi_x/c/sum/x-c
5.0x4.5: 591/541/556/219
3.5x4.5: 880/840/857/153
3.5x3.5: 1331/1273/1299/163