User name sarty
Log entry time 19:13:13 on May16,2004
Entry number 121941
keyword=Raster / beam size issues?run3610 - supposedly raster off
run3612 - with raster on
Pictures from spot++ look the same in both cases!?
MCC says (from their HARP scans, since we are not currently able to do the HARPS scans ourselves...Arne Freyberg has been contacted) that beam size is less than 300 microns...but spot++ with raster off seems to indicate a big beam.
FIGURE 1
FIGURE 2
