Main INDEX
Monthly INDEX
PREV
NEXT
User name paschke
Log entry time 13:03:50 on July18,2004
Entry number 128853
This entry is a followup to: 128852
keyword=Hall C charge asymmetry
Forgot to note: the previous entry discussed Run 2941, and the Hall C IA cell
did not appear to rail in other runs.
And to answer my question: the Hall C automatic feedback routine does forbid
any changed beyond 9.9, so it was railed, as far as our own software goes. We
should change that if its easy and get the last 200 ppm of dynamic range back.
Hopefully, we'll have a better solution for this soon.