• Main INDEX
  • Monthly INDEX
  • PREV
  • NEXT

    User name paschke

    Log entry time 13:03:50 on July18,2004

    Entry number 128853

    This entry is a followup to: 128852

    keyword=Hall C charge asymmetry

    
    Forgot to note: the previous entry discussed Run 2941, and the Hall C IA cell 
    did not appear to rail in other runs.
    
    And to answer my question: the Hall C automatic feedback routine does forbid 
    any changed beyond 9.9, so it was railed, as far as our own software goes.  We 
    should change that if its easy and get the last 200 ppm of dynamic range back.
    
    Hopefully, we'll have a better solution for this soon.