User name Nerses
Log entry time 00:17:43 on March 31, 2006
Entry number 168972
This entry is a followup to: 168963
keyword=DC efficiency and rate comparison after Beam increase from 7 to 8 µAAfter comparision of runs 3520, 3521 @ 7 muA and 3522,3523 @ 8muA we got the following table of chamber efficiency drop in percents.
| U | X | V | |
| 1 | 2 | 2 | 1.5 |
| 2 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 0 |
| 3 | 5 | 6.5 | 5 |
| 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 |
| 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 |
Figure 1 DC Rates method 1 Run 3523 at 8muA
Figure 2 DC Rates method 2 Run 3523 at 8muA
Figure 3 DC Rates method 1 Run 3522 at 8muA
Figure 4 DC Rates method 2 Run 3522 at 8muA
Figure 5 DC Rates method 1 Run 3521 at 7muA
Figure 6 DC Rates method 2 Run 3521 at 7muA
Figure 7 DC Rates method 1 Run 3520 at 7muA
Figure 8 DC Rates method 2 Run 3520 at 7muA
Figure 9 Efficiencies of chambers and tracks Run 3523 at 8muA
3523_merged.psFigure 10 Efficiencies of chambers and tracks Run 3522 at 8muA
3522_merged.psFigure 11 Efficiencies of chambers and tracks Run 3521 at 7muA
3521_merged.psFigure 12 Efficiencies of chambers and tracks Run 3520 at 7muA
3520_merged.ps