User name brads
Log entry time 22:58:13 on February 14, 2007
Entry number 193236
This entry is a followup to: 193223
Followups:
keyword=BPMB was reading back for 0.2uA from 0400--0500, Feb 13In case it makes diagnosis easier, we do have BMPB data in our files for 0.2uA runs taken from 0300--0500 on Feb 13. (At least the 'raster++' plots for those runs look good.)
If there is really a discrepancy between the BPM data in our data stream
and what MCC sees then there is a bigger mystery (EPICs problem?)
A copy of this log entry has been emailed to: rom@jlab.org, doug@jlab.org
Figure 1
