Make New Entry, Make Followup Entry
User name M.Iodice
Log entry time 01:47:57 on November27,2008
Entry number 250989
This entry is a followup to: 250879
Followups:
keyword=Rich optimization T/H delayFrom Entry 250879: T/H delay reduced from 360 to 160, thus shifted by -200 ns then from logbook seems T/H shifted +120ns from run 3954 on.
Thus, w.r.t previous "nominal" settings there is a shift of -80 ns.
Is that correct?
In the plot here attached I report the reslts from yesterday scan with the addition of the new point supposed to be at -80 ns.
It is anyway clear that the delay should be moved to more negative values.
FIGURE 1
