Make New Entry,
Make Followup Entry
User name R. Michaels
Log entry time 07:03:42 on November16,2009
Entry number 300294
This entry is a followup to: 300286
keyword=results of Qsq vs Rate
From the Low-I scan we see the Qsq is pretty flat wrt rate.
(Of course Qsq should not depend on rate. Any distortion is
an indication of systematics which we've known from HAPPEX.)
We see very marginal evidence of rate-distortions on L-HRS at ~100 kHz.
Stat. errors only shown. (much less than 0.1%)