Log entry time 18:01:19 on October 04, 2010

Entry number 333632

This entry is a followup to: 332993

Followups:

• 333649 10/04/10 21:44 R. Michaels re: EPICS problem : how to know if it's a problem with Podd or not

It seems that the EPICS variables still get truncated after some length.
I do get non-dummy values for the first set of anode currents, but still
-1e+32 after variable haVMI3128_3_AI28. Here is what I get for example
for run 6976:

analyzer [19]
E.Scan("haVMI3128_1_AI1:haVMI3128_3_AI28:haVMI3128_3_AI29:haVMI3128_4_AI1") 

************************************************************
*    Row   * haVMI3128 * haVMI3128 * haVMI3128 * haVMI3128 *
************************************************************
*        0 *    -1e+32 *    -1e+32 *    -1e+32 *    -1e+32 *
*        1 *    -1e+32 *    -1e+32 *    -1e+32 *    -1e+32 *
*        2 *    -1e+32 *    -1e+32 *    -1e+32 *    -1e+32 *
*        3 *    -1e+32 *    -1e+32 *    -1e+32 *    -1e+32 *
*        4 *    -1e+32 *    -1e+32 *    -1e+32 *    -1e+32 *
*        5 *    -1e+32 *    -1e+32 *    -1e+32 *    -1e+32 *
*        6 *    -1e+32 *    -1e+32 *    -1e+32 *    -1e+32 *
*        7 *    -1e+32 *    -1e+32 *    -1e+32 *    -1e+32 *
*        8 *    -1e+32 *    -1e+32 *    -1e+32 *    -1e+32 *
*        9 * 0.0073242 * 0.0035999 *    -1e+32 *    -1e+32 *
*       10 * 0.0073242 * 0.0035999 *    -1e+32 *    -1e+32 *
*       11 * 0.0073242 * 0.0035999 *    -1e+32 *    -1e+32 *
*       12 * 0.0073242 * 0.0035999 *    -1e+32 *    -1e+32 *
*       13 * 0.0073242 * 0.0035999 *    -1e+32 *    -1e+32 *
*       14 * 0.0073242 * 0.0035999 *    -1e+32 *    -1e+32 *
*       15 * 0.0073242 * 0.0035999 *    -1e+32 *    -1e+32 *
*       16 * 0.0073242 * 0.0035999 *    -1e+32 *    -1e+32 *
************************************************************

I am using the version of the analyzer Ole compiled today, but I get the
same thing with Bob's private patched version.