Log entry time 13:06:02 on October 25, 2010

Entry number 336676

This entry is a followup to: 336674

Followups:

• 336680 10/25/10 13:38 Hisham s1 and s2 efficiency

Figure-2: Paddle s1[4] is efficient compare x-distribution of T4 and T3 events

Figure-1: First amplitude distribution of s2.left[4] for T3 events with peak at (500) T->Draw("L.s2.la[4]","D.evtypebits==8&&abs(L.tr.tg_th)<0.1&&abs(L.tr.tg_ph)<0.05&&abs(L.tr.tg_y)<0.1&&L.s1.nthit==1","")

Second distribution of s2.left[4] for T3 events with one paddle hit in s2 with peak at (450)

T->Draw("L.s2.la[4]","D.evtypebits==8&&abs(L.tr.tg_th)<0.1&&abs(L.tr.tg_ph)<0.05&&abs(L.tr.tg_y)<0.1&&L.s2.nthit==1&&L.s2.lt[4]>0","same")

Third distribution of s2.left[4] for T4 events with one event at (407)

T->Draw("L.s2.la[4]","D.evtypebits==16&&abs(L.tr.tg_th)<0.1&&abs(L.tr.tg_ph)<0.05&&abs(L.tr.tg_y)<0.1&&L.s2.nthit==2&&L.s2.lt[4]>0","same")

T->Draw("L.s2.la[4]","D.evtypebits==16&&abs(L.tr.tg_th)<0.1&&abs(L.tr.tg_ph)<0.05&&abs(L.tr.tg_y)<0.1&&L.s2.nthit==0&&L.s2.lt[4]>0","same"), 0 events

Figure 1

Figure 2