• Main INDEX
  • Monthly INDEX
  • PREV
  • NEXT
    Make New Entry, Make Followup Entry

    User name jroche

    Log entry time 23:12:48 on December 13, 2010

    Entry number 344247

    This entry is a followup to: 344147

    Followups:

    keyword=data confirm that the downstream BCM loss 5% in gain

    I analyzed run 9585 from this morning and extrated rough gains for the upstream and downstream BCMs.

    It was rough because of its limited range (from 0.5 to 4 uA), because Hall B was on (but we checked that it was a small contribution at 4uA -see previous entry) and because we did not get data for the faraday cup. We calibrated the BCMs against OLO2.

    Here are the results from this calibration:

    U1  coeff=0.277+/-0.000 const=-0.166+/-0.003
    U3  coeff=0.090+/-0.000 const=-0.033+/-0.003
    U10 coeff=0.059+/-0.000 const= 0.007+/-0.003
    D1  coeff=0.246+/-0.000 const=-0.062+/-0.003
    D3  coeff=0.079+/-0.000 const= 0.005+/-0.003
    D10 coeff=0.025+/-0.000 const= 0.020+/-0.003
    ========
    U1   tcl process constant=  3702 offset=   614
    U3   tcl process constant= 11399 offset=   381
    U10  tcl process constant= 17360 offset=  -130
    D1   tcl process constant=  4160 offset=   258
    D3   tcl process constant= 12892 offset=   -70
    D10  tcl process constant= 40665 offset=  -804
    

    These results are to be compared to the one from the November 24 calibration here.

    Using the tcl process calibration constants, one can see clearly that the culprit is indeed the downstream calibration before the amplifiers.

        |new calibration | old calibration | new/old
    U1  |3702            | 3764            | 0.98
    U3  |11399           | 11480           | 0.99
    U10 |17360           | 17423           | 1.00
    D1  |4160            | 4430            | 0.94
    D3  |12892           | 13625           | 0.95
    D10 |40665           | 42870           | 0.95