• Main INDEX
  • Monthly INDEX
  • PREV
  • NEXT
    Make New Entry, Make Followup Entry

    User name R. Michaels

    Log entry time 19:19:19 on March 01, 2011

    Entry number 349464

    This entry is a followup to: 349435

    keyword=comments re: deadtime

    A few suggestions about the deadtime.
    
    If time permits, we should measure the readout deadtime of each crate
    by writing a "1" to the SFI output register at start of trigger 
    routine, and "0" at the end.  I think this is done in sfi4.crl 
    for example.  If one crate is dominating, we may consider what to
    do about it.  At some point, it may not be worth pursuing further.
    
    I'm not too surprised that dropping TS11 didn't help much, because
    although it sometimes added 5 msec of DT, this only happens every
    N events.  Not sure what N is, maybe 200.  Thus the average deadtime
    it contributes might be small compared to other crates.
    
    Finally, there is a well-known "dirty trick" one may consider.  All
    the DT scan runs were done with ps5=1.  If one goes to higher PS
    factors the triggers become more regularly spaced in time, so it's
    "like a pulser".  In the limit that's it's really like a pulser,
    the deadtime is zero, provided the rate is less than 1/T where T
    is the readout DT.  So, one may try, say, ps5=3 and 4 times the
    beam current to gain some percentage in overall rate.
    
    


    A copy of this log entry has been emailed to: lselvy,vasulk,camsonne,crowder