NEXT
Make New Entry,
Make Followup Entry
User name orchen
Log entry time 10:51:27 on March 07, 2011
Entry number 350795
This entry is a followup to: 350608
keyword=wire chamber efficiency results from HV & treshold scans (RESULTS ARE NOT CLEAR!!)
Here are the results.
The results are shown for different runs and for demanding hits in 2
palanes and 5 planes.
The settings of the different runs are listed here:
http://www.jlab.org/~adaq/halog/html/1102_archive/110225021622.html
http://www.jlab.org/~adaq/halog/html/1102_archive/110228040038.html
THERE IS A PROBLEM WITH RUNS 1830 & 1999!!!!
they have the same settings but very different results.
It looks like a systematics between the HV scan and the treshold scan.
Coansant treshold(5, 5.5) different HV(1700->1500)
Run number ch1-2hits ch2-2hits ch1-5hits ch2-5hits
1996 98.7 99.2 51.8 58.4
1998 99.1 99.3 56.5 61.4
1999 99.2 99.3 58.5 60.4
2000 99.1 99.1 57.2 57.6
2001 98.9 98.8 54.2 53.2
2002 98.5 98.6 49.0 50.5
Coansant HV (-166) different treshold (3.5->5 , 4->5.5)
Run number ch1-2hits ch2-2hits ch1-5hits ch2-5hits
1813 96.5 97.7 34.3 42.1
1826 97.7 98.3 41.9 46.2
1828 97.8 98.2 42.5 45.3
1830 97.7 97.9 42.2 43.4
A copy of this log entry has been emailed to: doug@jlab.org , eip@tauphy.tau.ac.il , or.chen@mail.huji.ac.il , igor.korover@gmail.com , jwatson@kent.edu , sgilad@mit.edu , vasulk@jlab.org , kelleher@jlab.org , brads@jlab.org , n.muangma@gmail.com