• Main INDEX
  • Monthly INDEX
  • PREV
  • NEXT
    Make New Entry, Make Followup Entry

    User name yez

    Log entry time 18:47:04 on March 23, 2011

    Entry number 352998

    Followups:

    keyword=L-HRS: Some issues with the PID of Cerenkov and PRL1&2

    After I calibrated Cer and PRLs, I studied the PID of Left HRS and found
    some issues:
     
     1,I cut on a small spot on PRL2.vs.PRL1 to select electrons, and look at
    the L.cer.asum_c (blue line). As you can see, there still have many low
    ADC channels in Cerenkov SUM, which means that from Cer, there are still
    many Pions. After I cut on L.cer.asum_c at >300, where the single
    electron peak is, the efficiency of electron already reduces to 97%.
    [[Image:L.prl.cer.png]]
    
     2, I did the reverse way by cutting on high ADC channels of Cer Sum
    (4000~5900), which indicates that most of them should be electrons.
    However, when I cut on the electron peaks of PRL1&2, there are only 87%
    of electrons. It looks like some pions deposite very big energy in
    Cerenkov, which does not make sence since their energy must be very huge
    to produce big signals in cerenkov PMTs.  
    [[Image:L.prl.eff.png]]
    
     3, I look at the L.tr.beta (raw beta before timing calibration). As you
    can see, even I cut on PRL1.vs.PRL2 to pick electrons, in the beta
    spectrum, the peak of pion is still very comparable to electron peaks.
    [[Image:L.beta.eff.png]]
    
     4, After only applying cut on L.cer.asum_c>4000, which basically can
    remove most of pion, I plot of L.tr.beta,and still find that there is a
    pion peak.
    [[Image:L.beta.eff2.png]]
    
     In a word, it looks like the ADC signals of Cerenkov and PRL do not look
    normal. Is there any problem with the synchronization of ADCs and triggers?
    
    


    A copy of this log entry has been emailed to: camsonne, vasulk



    L.cer.eff.png



    L.prl.eff.png



    L.beta.eff.png



    L.beta.eff2.png