We took some optics data on R-HRS while taking Produciton Data on L-HRS. E0=3.356, P0_R=2.600 (RQ3=2.2808),Theta=23.00 1, Momentum Scan: Raster On, 4cm Dummy #3695: +3%: P_R=2.678,RQ3=2.3492, 20uA, 500K events #3698: +0%: P_R=2.600,RQ3=2.2808, 20uA, 576K events #3704: -3%: P_R=2.678,RQ3=2.3492, 10uA, 426K events 2, Vertex Data: P0_R=2.600,RQ3=2.2808,Theta=23.00 #3699, BeO target, Raster Off, 20uA, 400K #3700, Multi-C target, Raster Off, 20uA, 400K #3701, Multi-C target, Raster On, 20uA, 400K From Fig1,2, you can see the under our kinematics setting, the R-HRS optics matrix that we are using is worse than previous kinemtics setting during d-Threshold: http://www.jlab.org/~adaq/halog/html/1104_archive/110412163131.html Hence we need to get good optics data to calibrate the optics to get better resolution. So far the only data set we miss is Sieve Slit data.
Run#3699 for BeO
Run#3700 for Multi-C