• Main INDEX
  • Monthly INDEX
  • PREV
  • NEXT
    Make New Entry, Make Followup Entry

    User name brads

    Log entry time 12:31:06 on March 13, 2012

    Entry number 366213

    This entry is a followup to: 366212

    keyword=re: changed attenuate for BPM and raster

    Hardware adjustments at this level need to be discussed with the RC first.

    If the 'saturation' mentioned here was the negligible issue noted Monday OWL, the attenuator change was not needed at all...

    If there were serious issues noted during the 2--3 hours of Harp scans and BPM runs done last night, then where is the HALOG? If there were no serious issues, why did we set ourselves up to spend more time on yet another BPM/HARP calibration (plus the associate offline analysis)?

    A copy of this log entry has been emailed to: camsonne@jlab.org,vasulk@jlab.org,kalyan@jlab.org,rbziel@jlab.org,tbadman@jlab.org,melissac@jlab.org,jpchen@jlab.org,slifer@jlab.org, pzhu