Tuesday, July 26, 2:30pm ETD
From Hall A Wiki
Agenda
Presentations:
- photon simulations (Michael Snider - high school summer student)
- acceptance plots from collimator optimization study (Sereres)
- Discussion - Other projects
Minutes
Action items in bold.
Attendance: Mark Pitt, Michael Snider, Michael Gericke, Anna Lee, Damon Spayde, Seamus Riordan, Sereres Johnston, Wouter Deconinck (minutes), Juliette Mammei (chair)
- Michael Snider presented results from his photon background studies (see elog entry 199, link in agenda)
- attachment 2: previous results could be replicated for ee, ep, ine, and photon background
- table 1: new results
- photon background from ep is largest
- total photon background rate is 13.7 GHz, compared to 171.7 GHz moller rate
- attachment 1: origin of the photon background is around the collimator edges, similar for all processes
- attachment 3: simulation with helium, very similar but recent results and not sure if correct
- thickness of helium only 0.5% (according to Juliette)
- origin for He study: Roger's suggestion to keep the petal beamline, but fill it with He, primary beam would go through He
- Mark: why do you expect any difference if most of the photons are shown to come from the collimator edges?
- Juliette: from the table it seems that 2 GHz of ee photons come from other sources than target and collimator
- Wouter: primary beam through He not simulated, but Juliette points out small UHV beamline inside He
- acceptance defining collimator is visible -> not good
- no photons from target visible (z pos < 4m) -> good
- Sereres will take this over from Michael
- Sereres presented results from her collimator optimization studies (see elog 200, link in agenda)
- progress in developing figure of merit and separation according to polar angles
- attachment 1: radius versus theta_CM -> "eyebrow" (compare to Qweak "moustache")
- KK rule of thumb: lower right panel should be as vertical as possible by tweaking field map (points to good focusing)
- reasons for KK's rule of thumb not well understood by those present
- presented figures use default conductor field map
- Sereres will make these plots for the proposal field map
- Sereres will turn off radiation in G4 and compare with results from Tosca
- attachment 5: top right is how KK wants this to look
- need to trim using collimators, but without changing the magnet and without affecting FOM
- Sereres will repeat these studies for different fieldmaps and collimator geometries (looking for input...)
- attachment 16-17: lower right should be symmetric (as in attachment 15)
- attachment 20: radial width primarily determined by midrange scattering angles, shrinking this width will reduce photon backgrounds
- Sereres will look at different detector plan positions, less than 26 m, but 2 m range, e.g. steps of 50 cm
- Other projects listed on Moller simulations page
- Michael Gericke will update webpage with plan of attack for detector simulations
- GDML support on central G4 installation is missing
- Meeting time: every two weeks, same time, until fall semester starts, then revisit
- Seamus will move SVN repository from Umass to JLab (someone should tell him)
Return to MOLLER at 11 GeV E09-005