Difference between revisions of "31 March 2011 Meeting Summary"
From Hall A Wiki
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
#with Q3 cut, target and fp comparison becomes better. XS at central dp is good, at edge is bad with small Q3 cut. (-0.03<dp<0.03, bin size=0.01) | #with Q3 cut, target and fp comparison becomes better. XS at central dp is good, at edge is bad with small Q3 cut. (-0.03<dp<0.03, bin size=0.01) | ||
#Since have 6 bins, the cross section at large omega(small Ep, dp) is higher, meaning acceptance is small. Because there is overlap for the adjacent runs, we can correct the acceptance at this small dp. | #Since have 6 bins, the cross section at large omega(small Ep, dp) is higher, meaning acceptance is small. Because there is overlap for the adjacent runs, we can correct the acceptance at this small dp. | ||
| + | #For right arm, |theta|<0.04 |phi|<0.014 |dp|<0.03, for |dp-0.02|<0.01, the acceptance needs to be corrected with overlap omega region. | ||
Revision as of 10:56, 31 March 2011
1.NaI detector check
2.Cross sections check with different Q3, theta and phi cuts
xinhu:
- NaI Box 2 looks ok. Box 3 block 22( in the middle of box 3, for lower energy ), so cut it. But it's not for all runs(xinhu will upload the figure with good 22 block).
- with Q3 cut, target and fp comparison becomes better. XS at central dp is good, at edge is bad with small Q3 cut. (-0.03<dp<0.03, bin size=0.01)
- Since have 6 bins, the cross section at large omega(small Ep, dp) is higher, meaning acceptance is small. Because there is overlap for the adjacent runs, we can correct the acceptance at this small dp.
- For right arm, |theta|<0.04 |phi|<0.014 |dp|<0.03, for |dp-0.02|<0.01, the acceptance needs to be corrected with overlap omega region.
