Difference between revisions of "Cryo-target wall contamination"

From Hall A Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Kinematic 5.2)
(Kinematic 5.2)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Kinematic 5.2 ==
 
 
 
The normalized yield is equal to Ngood/Q/density. Here I neglected the density of the 3He gas.
 
The normalized yield is equal to Ngood/Q/density. Here I neglected the density of the 3He gas.
 +
 +
 +
== Kinematic 5.2 ==
  
  
Line 38: Line 39:
  
 
[[Image:dummy_5.2_all.gif]]
 
[[Image:dummy_5.2_all.gif]]
 +
 +
 +
== Kinematic 6.5 ==
 +
 +
 +
{| border="1" cellpadding="2"
 +
|-
 +
! Target
 +
! colspan="2" | window thickness
 +
! Total charge
 +
! # of good evts
 +
|-
 +
|
 +
| upstream
 +
| downstream
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
| He3
 +
| 0.0274 cm
 +
| 0.0328 cm
 +
| ?E+8
 +
| ?
 +
|-
 +
| Dummy
 +
| 0.1581 cm
 +
| 0.1585 cm
 +
| ?E+8
 +
| ?
 +
|-
 +
|}
 +
 +
Result: An estimate of ? events wall events remains within the cut ==> Contamination is less than ?%.
 +
 +
 +
 +
[[Image:he3_6.5_all.gif]]
 +
 +
[[Image:dummy_6.5_all.gif]]

Revision as of 19:35, 28 April 2011

The normalized yield is equal to Ngood/Q/density. Here I neglected the density of the 3He gas.


Kinematic 5.2

Target window thickness Total charge # of good evts
upstream downstream
He3 0.0274 cm 0.0328 cm 6.92E+8 253254
Dummy 0.1581 cm 0.1585 cm 2.16E+8 3588

Result: An estimate of 2186 events wall events remains within the cut ==> Contamination is less than 1%.


He3 5.2 all.gif

Dummy 5.2 all.gif


Kinematic 6.5

Target window thickness Total charge # of good evts
upstream downstream
He3 0.0274 cm 0.0328 cm  ?E+8  ?
Dummy 0.1581 cm 0.1585 cm  ?E+8  ?

Result: An estimate of ? events wall events remains within the cut ==> Contamination is less than ?%.


He3 6.5 all.gif

Dummy 6.5 all.gif