Difference between revisions of "Cryo-target wall contamination"

From Hall A Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(New page: == Kinematic 5.2 == The normalized yield is equal to Ngood/Q/density. Image:he3_5.2_all.gif [Image:dummy_5.2_all.gif]])
 
(Kinematic 6.5)
 
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
The normalized yield is equal to Ngood/Q/density. Here I neglected the density of the 3He gas.
 +
 +
 
== Kinematic 5.2 ==
 
== Kinematic 5.2 ==
  
The normalized yield is equal to Ngood/Q/density.
 
  
 +
{| border="1" cellpadding="2"
 +
|-
 +
! Target
 +
! colspan="2" | window thickness
 +
! Total charge
 +
! # of good evts
 +
|-
 +
|
 +
| upstream
 +
| downstream
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
| He3
 +
| 0.0274 cm
 +
| 0.0328 cm
 +
| 6.92E+8
 +
| 253254
 +
|-
 +
| Dummy
 +
| 0.1581 cm
 +
| 0.1585 cm
 +
| 2.16E+8
 +
| 3588
 +
|-
 +
|}
  
 +
Result: An estimate of 2186 events wall events remains within the cut ==> Contamination is less than 1%.
  
  
  
 
[[Image:he3_5.2_all.gif]]
 
[[Image:he3_5.2_all.gif]]
[Image:dummy_5.2_all.gif]]
+
 
 +
[[Image:dummy_5.2_all.gif]]
 +
 
 +
 
 +
== Kinematic 6.5 ==
 +
 
 +
 
 +
{| border="1" cellpadding="2"
 +
|-
 +
! Target
 +
! colspan="2" | window thickness
 +
! Total charge
 +
! # of good evts
 +
|-
 +
|
 +
| upstream
 +
| downstream
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
| He3
 +
| 0.0274 cm
 +
| 0.0328 cm
 +
| 1.045E+9
 +
| 110050
 +
|-
 +
| Dummy
 +
| 0.1581 cm
 +
| 0.1585 cm
 +
| 1.316E+7
 +
| 294
 +
|-
 +
|}
 +
 
 +
Result: An estimate of 4439 events wall events remains within the cut ==> Contamination is 4%.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
[[Image:he3_6.5_all.gif]]
 +
 
 +
[[Image:dummy_6.5_all.gif]]
 +
 
 +
 
 +
* With the full statistic collected till run 4039 (the last plot has the dummy histo multiply by 30) and the following cuts were applied to 3He and dummy runs:
 +
 
 +
  -  sprintf(cutnom,"L.tr.n==1 && DBB.edtpr[0]==0 && (DBB.evtypebits>>3)&1");
 +
  -  sprintf(cutdum_y,"abs(L.tr.tg_y-0.0025)<0.030"); or sprintf(cuthe_y,"abs(L.tr.tg_y)<0.030");
 +
  -  sprintf(cutphi,"abs(L.tr.tg_ph)<0.020");
 +
  -  sprintf(cuttheta,"abs(L.tr.tg_th)<0.040");
 +
  -  sprintf(cutcer,"L.cer.asum_c>300 && L.cer.asum_c<8000");
 +
  -  sprintf(cutcalo,"(L.prl1.asum_c+L.prl2.asum_c)>1000");
 +
  -  sprintf(cutdum_all,"%s && %s && %s && %s && %s && %s", cutnom, cutdum_y, cutphi, cuttheta, cutcer, cutcalo); or sprintf(cuthe_all,"%s && %s && %s && %s && %s && %s", cutnom, cuthe_y, cutphi, cuttheta, cutcer, cutcalo);
 +
 
 +
[[Image:dummycont_6.5.gif]]

Latest revision as of 15:18, 1 May 2011

The normalized yield is equal to Ngood/Q/density. Here I neglected the density of the 3He gas.


Kinematic 5.2

Target window thickness Total charge # of good evts
upstream downstream
He3 0.0274 cm 0.0328 cm 6.92E+8 253254
Dummy 0.1581 cm 0.1585 cm 2.16E+8 3588

Result: An estimate of 2186 events wall events remains within the cut ==> Contamination is less than 1%.


He3 5.2 all.gif

Dummy 5.2 all.gif


Kinematic 6.5

Target window thickness Total charge # of good evts
upstream downstream
He3 0.0274 cm 0.0328 cm 1.045E+9 110050
Dummy 0.1581 cm 0.1585 cm 1.316E+7 294

Result: An estimate of 4439 events wall events remains within the cut ==> Contamination is 4%.


He3 6.5 all.gif

Dummy 6.5 all.gif


  • With the full statistic collected till run 4039 (the last plot has the dummy histo multiply by 30) and the following cuts were applied to 3He and dummy runs:
 -  sprintf(cutnom,"L.tr.n==1 && DBB.edtpr[0]==0 && (DBB.evtypebits>>3)&1");
 -  sprintf(cutdum_y,"abs(L.tr.tg_y-0.0025)<0.030"); or sprintf(cuthe_y,"abs(L.tr.tg_y)<0.030");
 -  sprintf(cutphi,"abs(L.tr.tg_ph)<0.020");
 -  sprintf(cuttheta,"abs(L.tr.tg_th)<0.040");
 -  sprintf(cutcer,"L.cer.asum_c>300 && L.cer.asum_c<8000");
 -  sprintf(cutcalo,"(L.prl1.asum_c+L.prl2.asum_c)>1000");
 -  sprintf(cutdum_all,"%s && %s && %s && %s && %s && %s", cutnom, cutdum_y, cutphi, cuttheta, cutcer, cutcalo); or sprintf(cuthe_all,"%s && %s && %s && %s && %s && %s", cutnom, cuthe_y, cutphi, cuttheta, cutcer, cutcalo);

Dummycont 6.5.gif