Difference between revisions of "Solid Background"

From Hall A Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(New page: ** energy flux on EC *** geant3 has EM process total energy cut at 1MeV *** Both SIDIS and PVDIS have confirmed energy flux on EC by the genat3 simulation in the proposals. *** geant4 geom...)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
** energy flux on EC
+
== energy flux on EC ==
 
*** geant3 has EM process total energy cut at 1MeV
 
*** geant3 has EM process total energy cut at 1MeV
 
*** Both SIDIS and PVDIS have confirmed energy flux on EC by the genat3 simulation in the proposals.
 
*** Both SIDIS and PVDIS have confirmed energy flux on EC by the genat3 simulation in the proposals.
Line 6: Line 6:
 
*** More careful study like particle type, hit processing under way.
 
*** More careful study like particle type, hit processing under way.
  
[[Image:solid_BaBar_SIDIS_background_vertex.png|thumb|600px|left|solid_BaBar_SIDIS_background_vertex of hits on forward EC]]
+
[[Image:solid_BaBar_SIDIS_background_vertex.png|thumb|600px|left|solid_BaBar_SIDIS_background_vertex of hits on forward EC (top:electron, middle:photon,bottom:others)]]
[[Image:solid_BaBar_PVDIS_nobaffle_background_vertex.png|thumb|600px|left|solid_BaBar_PVDIS_nobaffle_background_vertex of hits on forward EC]]
+
[[Image:solid_BaBar_PVDIS_nobaffle_background_vertex.png|thumb|600px|left|solid_BaBar_PVDIS_nobaffle_background_vertex of hits on forward EC(top:electron, middle:photon,bottom:others)]]
 +
 
 +
 
  
 
<br clear="all">
 
<br clear="all">
  
** rate on GEM
+
== rate on GEM ==
 
*** rate on GEM need more study, particular from photon-induced rate, SBS has more mature simulation tested with data, their photon-induced rate is about twice of electron rate, need to learn from them.
 
*** rate on GEM need more study, particular from photon-induced rate, SBS has more mature simulation tested with data, their photon-induced rate is about twice of electron rate, need to learn from them.

Revision as of 23:25, 22 June 2011

energy flux on EC

      • geant3 has EM process total energy cut at 1MeV
      • Both SIDIS and PVDIS have confirmed energy flux on EC by the genat3 simulation in the proposals.
      • geant4 geometry and materiel checked, no simple mistake found.
      • with energy cut on 1MeV, SIDIS geant4 result is close SIDIS geant3, but PVDIS geant4 is still one order larger than PVDIS geant3.
      • More careful study like particle type, hit processing under way.
solid_BaBar_SIDIS_background_vertex of hits on forward EC (top:electron, middle:photon,bottom:others)
solid_BaBar_PVDIS_nobaffle_background_vertex of hits on forward EC(top:electron, middle:photon,bottom:others)



rate on GEM

      • rate on GEM need more study, particular from photon-induced rate, SBS has more mature simulation tested with data, their photon-induced rate is about twice of electron rate, need to learn from them.