Difference between revisions of "Baffle Design"
From Hall A Wiki
m |
(→Baffle Comparisons) |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|New design from ray tracing | |New design from ray tracing | ||
| − | | [https://userweb.jlab.org/~riordan/ | + | | [https://userweb.jlab.org/~riordan/20111026/index.html] |
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 12:46, 26 October 2011
Eugene's Baffles
Zhiwen's Evaluation of Eugene's Baffles in GEMC
Baffle Comparisons
Seamus' Baffle Comparisons
| Eugene's BaBar Design in GEMC | [1] |
| Eugene's for Other Magnets | [2] |
| Basic New Designs | [3] |
| New design from ray tracing | [4] |
Baffles Design
Designing baffles from ray traces requires GEMC runs without baffles, but detectors at the baffle z positions.
We define as fixed number of blocks which expand over a radius that will accept the full angular range from the whole target. Each block then has a range in phi, which we fit:
These are then considered, for each block over all baffles, to carve out an opening which does not allow particles below a momentum from making it through. There is a maximum opening which is defined from the number of sectors, along with a minimum "dead zone" which prevents photons.
