Difference between revisions of "Solid Background"

From Hall A Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(some estimation)
Line 11: Line 11:
 
  3he(10amg), 40cm, density=1.345e-3g/cm3=10*44.6(amg=mol/m3)*3.016(g/mol), X=40/(67.42/1.345e-3)=0.8e-3, Lumi=15e-6/1.6e-19*40*1.345e-3*6.02e23=3e36/cm2/s
 
  3he(10amg), 40cm, density=1.345e-3g/cm3=10*44.6(amg=mol/m3)*3.016(g/mol), X=40/(67.42/1.345e-3)=0.8e-3, Lumi=15e-6/1.6e-19*40*1.345e-3*6.02e23=3e36/cm2/s
 
  GE180 glass window, 2*120um, density 2.76g/cm3, X=2*120e-4/(19.4/2.76)=3.4e-3, Lumi=15e-6/1.6e-19*2*120e-4*2.76*6.02e23=3.7e36/cm2/s
 
  GE180 glass window, 2*120um, density 2.76g/cm3, X=2*120e-4/(19.4/2.76)=3.4e-3, Lumi=15e-6/1.6e-19*2*120e-4*2.76*6.02e23=3.7e36/cm2/s
 +
 +
SIDIS proton
 +
100nA
 +
NH3
  
 
JPsi
 
JPsi

Revision as of 13:46, 15 November 2012

some estimation

PVDIS

50uA, 
LH target, 50cm, 0.071g/cm3, X=50/890.4=5.6e-2, Lumi=50e-6/1.6e-19*50*0.071*6.02e23=0.67e39/cm2/s
LD target, 50cm, 0.169g/cm3, X=50/745.4=6.7e-2, Lumi=50e-6/1.6e-19*50*0.169*6.02e23=1.59e39/cm2/s
Al window, 2*100um, density 2.7g/cm3, X=2*100e-4/8.897=2.25e-3, Lumi=50e-6/1.6e-19*2*100e-4*2.7*6.02e23=1e37/cm2/s

SIDIS 3he

15uA
3he(10amg), 40cm, density=1.345e-3g/cm3=10*44.6(amg=mol/m3)*3.016(g/mol), X=40/(67.42/1.345e-3)=0.8e-3, Lumi=15e-6/1.6e-19*40*1.345e-3*6.02e23=3e36/cm2/s
GE180 glass window, 2*120um, density 2.76g/cm3, X=2*120e-4/(19.4/2.76)=3.4e-3, Lumi=15e-6/1.6e-19*2*120e-4*2.76*6.02e23=3.7e36/cm2/s

SIDIS proton

100nA
NH3

JPsi

3uA
LH target, 15cm, 0.071g/cm3, X=15/890.4=1.7e-2, Lumi=3e-6/1.6e-19*15*0.071*6.02e23=1.2e37/cm2/s
Al window, 2*100um, density 2.7g/cm3, X=2*100e-4/8.897=2.25e-3, Lumi=3e-6/1.6e-19*2*100e-4*2.7*6.02e23=6e35/cm2/s

PVDIS Geant4 modeled background from Target

Rates and flux from GEMC for PVDIS follow. Validation against GEANT3 can be found here: Compare_to_geant3_result.

Rates on GEMs for 50uA on LH2. Solid lines are unbaffled, dashed are with lead baffles:

Geant4 truegemrate.png

Flux in EM calorimeter for 50uA on LH2. Solid lines are unbaffled, dashed are with lead baffles. The true rate should be taken from the black lines.

Emflux.png

SIDIS Geant4 modeled background from Target

Sidisgem.png

<math>\pi</math>/e Ratio

See here