Difference between revisions of "Solid Background"
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
= rate = | = rate = | ||
− | = SIDIS e and hadron rate = | + | == SIDIS e and hadron rate == |
generated by "collider", the code and script for analyzing result are at | generated by "collider", the code and script for analyzing result are at | ||
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
http://hallaweb.jlab.org/12GeV/SoLID/download/sim/rate/SIDIS_He3/double/ | http://hallaweb.jlab.org/12GeV/SoLID/download/sim/rate/SIDIS_He3/double/ | ||
− | = single particle rate = | + | == single particle rate == |
individual particle rate and pi/e ratio at vertex are available here | individual particle rate and pi/e ratio at vertex are available here | ||
Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
note: in eicRate, eDIS and eES crosssection is from CTEQ6 fit, all DIS hadrons crossection is from Wiser fit particles from resonance region is still missing as 2013/03 | note: in eicRate, eDIS and eES crosssection is from CTEQ6 fit, all DIS hadrons crossection is from Wiser fit particles from resonance region is still missing as 2013/03 | ||
+ | |||
+ | == rate study == | ||
+ | |||
+ | [http://hallaweb.jlab.org/12GeV/SoLID/download/sim/talk/transversity_rate_comparison.pdf pdf] Comparison with 6GeV transversity data by Xin Qian | ||
+ | |||
+ | [http://hallaweb.jlab.org/12GeV/SoLID/download/sim/talk/rate_comparison_zwzhao_20131204.pptx pptx][http://hallaweb.jlab.org/12GeV/SoLID/download/sim/talk/rate_comparison_zwzhao_20131204.pdf ] study by Zhiwen Zhao and Zhihong Ye | ||
+ | |||
+ | [http://hallaweb.jlab.org/12GeV/SoLID/download/sim/talk/wiser_table.pdf pdf] study by Nguyen Tonn and Xiaochao Zheng | ||
+ | |||
= background = | = background = |
Revision as of 18:59, 21 February 2014
Contents
some estimation
PVDIS
50uA, LH target, 40cm, 0.071g/cm3, X=40/890.4=4.5e-2, Lumi=50e-6/1.6e-19*40*0.071*6.02e23=0.53e39/cm2/s LD target, 40cm, 0.169g/cm3, X=40/745.4=5.4e-2, Lumi=50e-6/1.6e-19*40*0.169*6.02e23=1.27e39/cm2/s Al window, 2*100um, density 2.7g/cm3, X=2*100e-4/8.897=2.25e-3, Lumi=50e-6/1.6e-19*2*100e-4*2.7*6.02e23=1e37/cm2/s
SIDIS 3he
15uA 3he(10amg), 40cm, density=10*44.6(amg=mol/m3)*3.016(g/mol)=1.345e-3g/cm3, X=40/(67.42/1.345e-3)=0.8e-3, Lumi=15e-6/1.6e-19*40*1.345e-3*6.02e23=3e36/cm2/s GE180 glass window, 2*120um, density 2.76g/cm3, X=2*120e-4/(19.4/2.76)=3.4e-3, Lumi=15e-6/1.6e-19*2*120e-4*2.76*6.02e23=3.7e36/cm2/s
SIDIS proton
100nA NH3
JPsi
3uA LH target, 15cm, 0.071g/cm3, X=15/890.4=1.7e-2, Lumi=3e-6/1.6e-19*15*0.071*6.02e23=1.2e37/cm2/s Al window, 2*100um, density 2.7g/cm3, X=2*100e-4/8.897=2.25e-3, Lumi=3e-6/1.6e-19*2*100e-4*2.7*6.02e23=6e35/cm2/s
rate
SIDIS e and hadron rate
generated by "collider", the code and script for analyzing result are at https://jlabsvn.jlab.org/svnroot/solid/evgen/collider
The result is here http://hallaweb.jlab.org/12GeV/SoLID/download/sim/rate/SIDIS_He3/double/
single particle rate
individual particle rate and pi/e ratio at vertex are available here
various particle from vertex is estimated by "eicRate" in our event generator repository. The code and script for analyzing result are at https://jlabsvn.jlab.org/svnroot/solid/evgen/eicRate_20101102 https://jlabsvn.jlab.org/svnroot/solid/evgen/eicRate_20101102/output
The result is here http://hallaweb.jlab.org/12GeV/SoLID/download/sim/rate
*root is eicRate output tree, *.lund can be used as input for SoLID GEMC
note: in eicRate, eDIS and eES crosssection is from CTEQ6 fit, all DIS hadrons crossection is from Wiser fit particles from resonance region is still missing as 2013/03
rate study
pdf Comparison with 6GeV transversity data by Xin Qian
pptx[1] study by Zhiwen Zhao and Zhihong Ye
pdf study by Nguyen Tonn and Xiaochao Zheng
background
EM and neutron background is estimated from shooting beam into target with SoLID GEMC
background from eDIS, eES and DIS hadron are using the rate at vertex as input into SoLID GEMC
The code is in SVN at https://jlabsvn.jlab.org/svnroot/solid/solid_gemc/analysistool/background
The result is here http://hallaweb.jlab.org/12GeV/SoLID/download/sim/background
for different detector and for different particles, we have histograms showing rate "Eklog_R_hitid_pid" rate(kHz/mm2) at R(cm) and log10(Ek)(GeV) with bin(300, 0, 300, 50,-6,1.3) "Eklog_R_high_hitid_pid" rate(kHz/mm2) at R(cm) and log10(Ek)(GeV) with bin(300, 0, 300, 50,-6,1.3) for Phi (0,6)deg "Eklog_R_low_hitid_pid" rate(kHz/mm2) at R(cm) and log10(Ek)(GeV) with bin(300, 0, 300, 50,-6,1.3) for Phi (6,12)deg "Eklog_R_Phi_hitid_pid" rate(kHz) at Phi(deg), R(cm) and log10(Ek)(GeV) with bin(48,0,12,300, 0, 300, 50,-6,1.3) there are many other histograms produced with similar names
Because all histograms are produced the same way. One can simply add root files together by "hadd" to look at the result in sum
hitid =0 - 5 GEM plane 1 - 6 6 LGCC PMT 18 LGCC front 7 HGCC PMT 19 HGCC front 8 - 11 FAEC front,middle,inner,rear 12 -15 LAEC front,middle,inner,rear 16,17,26 MRPC front,glass,gas 20 - 25 GEM plane 1 - 6 front 27 - 28 SPD front,scintillator pid =0 photon+electron+positron 1 photon 2 electron + positron 3 neutron 4 proton 5 pip 6 pim 7 Kp 8 Km 9 Kl 10 other
other staff
PVDIS Geant4 modeled background from Target
Rates and flux from GEMC for PVDIS follow. Validation against GEANT3 can be found here: Compare_to_geant3_result.
Rates on GEMs for 50uA on LH2. Solid lines are unbaffled, dashed are with lead baffles:
Flux in EM calorimeter for 50uA on LH2. Solid lines are unbaffled, dashed are with lead baffles. The true rate should be taken from the black lines.
SIDIS Geant4 modeled background from Target
<math>\pi</math>/e Ratio
See here