Difference between revisions of "G2p 1157 25T"

Latest revision as of 11:32, 11 February 2015

**Left Arm**
HRS Momentum (MeV)	Material #	Spread (%)	Runs	Comments	Conclusion
1168	12	-	1
1151	12	-	1
1113	12	-	1
1082	14	-	1
1081	12	2.2%	8	Shift worker noticed 3rd arm rate was high for 5034-5039. Didn't see anything on Spot_3 but moved beam position down by 0.5 mm to get more normal 3rd arm rates for runs 5044-5045
1017	11	6.1%	27	For first set of runs where yield is drifting larger, target y is drifting more and more negative. Starts at -7.7mm and drifts to -10.1mm. There is potentially beam scraping in first set of runs where beam drifts. 3rd arm rate increased but not seen in HRS spot++. Decreased raster size to 1.5cm for first set of runs as well. Beam then went down and after tuning the raster size was set to an oval. First run is 4818. HWP removed prior to 4832 and then beam became unstable. Run 4835 has no track efficiency data in MySQL
1017	14	-	1
1006	12	0.29%	7
1006	11	0.39%	11
956	11	1.1%	20
956	14	0.04%	2
935	11	0.63%	18
898	11	2.5%	22	Last two runs contribute most to spread. It's also where beam x and beam y are most different from rest of values. The shift is ~0.5mm for both X/Y for those two runs.In MySQL there are no error bars on BPM info.
898	14	0.01%	2
870	11	0.9%	12	5101 had no L.rec.dp info so used L.gold.dp instead, 5095, 5101 has no BPM info in MySQL
870	13	0.4%	19
870	14	2.8%	3	Take one run and then come back much later and take two more. The second two are in disagreement with the first run. Beam X/Y are ~0.5mm different between the two sets of runs. The second set of runs also had a mismatched septum current on L/R HRS.
844	11	2.7%	20
844	14	0.08%	2
809	14	3.8%	20	Took 18 runs and then came back much later and took 2 more, the two additional runs contribute to the large spread. For the second set of runs, there is a mismatch in L/R septa currents. Target X changes by ~1mm for second set of runs. Target Y changes by ~0.2mm
794	11	2.2%	16	Shifts in beam energy on the order of 0.5 MeV during runs due to Hall C running conditions. HALOG also says 3rd arm saw some beam scraping for some runs. Not sure if it's in the HRS too.
794	14	0.09%	2
752	14	5.2%	16	Took 14 runs and then came back much later and took 2 more, the two additional runs contribute to the large spread. Spread in first set of runs is ~2.5%. Target X changes ~1mm and Target Y changes ~0.5mm from first to second set of runs. There is also variation in first set of runs in beam position on the order of 0.5mm - 1.0mm.
752	13	0.6%	14
746	12	2.1%	9
746	14	0.07%	2
701	12	1.8%	10
700	13	0.8%	24
700	14	0.17%	2
659	12	2.1%	11
651	14	0.4%	8
619	12	1.9%	7
582	12	3.8%	9	First run is about a 1mm lower in target y and contributes most to spread
563	14	0.23%	2
547	12	1.7%	8
523	14	0.07%	2

More detailed 1.157GeV 2.5T Transverse left arm plots are available here

**Right Arm**
HRS Momentum (MeV)	Material #	Spread (%)	Runs	Comments	Conclusion
1017	11	1.9%	26

More detailed 1.157GeV 2.5T Transverse right arm plots are available here

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {| {{table}} style="text-align:center"
 |+ '''Left Arm'''
-| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|''' HRS Momentum (MeV)  '''
+| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;width:75px"|''' HRS Momentum (MeV)  '''
-| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|''' Material #  '''
+| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;width:75px"|''' Material #  '''
-| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|''' Spread (%)  '''
+| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;width:75px"|''' Spread (%)  '''
-| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|''' Runs '''
+| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;width:75px"|''' Runs '''
 | align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0; width:200px "|''' Comments  '''
 | align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0; width:400px "|''' Conclusion  '''
@@ Line 16: / Line 16: @@
 |[http://userweb.jlab.org/~rbziel/wikiplots/1157_25T_L/1157_25T_1082_yield2_mat14.gif 1082] || 14||  -  ||  1 || style="text-align:left;" | || style="text-align:left;" |
 |-
-|[http://userweb.jlab.org/~rbziel/wikiplots/1157_25T_L/1157_25T_1081_yield_mat12.gif 1081] || 12||  2.7%  ||  8 || style="text-align:left;" | || style="text-align:left;" |
+|[http://userweb.jlab.org/~rbziel/wikiplots/1157_25T_L/1157_25T_1081_yield_mat12.gif 1081] || 12||  2.2%  ||  8 || style="text-align:left;" |Shift worker noticed 3rd arm rate was high for 5034-5039. Didn't see anything on Spot_3 but moved beam position down by 0.5 mm to get more normal 3rd arm rates for runs 5044-5045 || style="text-align:left;" |
 |-
-|[http://userweb.jlab.org/~rbziel/wikiplots/1157_25T_L/1157_25T_1017_yield_mat11.gif 1017] || 11||  10.7%  ||  27 || style="text-align:left;" | || style="text-align:left;" |
+|[http://userweb.jlab.org/~rbziel/wikiplots/1157_25T_L/1157_25T_1017_yield_mat11.gif 1017] || 11||  6.1%  ||  27 || style="text-align:left;" |For first set of runs where yield is drifting larger, target y is drifting more and more negative. Starts at -7.7mm and drifts to -10.1mm. There is potentially beam scraping in first set of runs where beam drifts. 3rd arm rate increased but not seen in HRS spot++. Decreased raster size to 1.5cm for first set of runs as well. Beam then went down and after tuning the raster size was set to an oval. First run is 4818.  HWP removed prior to 4832 and then beam became unstable. Run 4835 has no track efficiency data in MySQL || style="text-align:left;" |
 |-
 |[http://userweb.jlab.org/~rbziel/wikiplots/1157_25T_L/1157_25T_1017_yield2_mat14.gif 1017] || 14||  -  ||  1 || style="text-align:left;" | || style="text-align:left;" |
@@ Line 26: / Line 26: @@
 |[http://userweb.jlab.org/~rbziel/wikiplots/1157_25T_L/1157_25T_1006_yield_mat11.gif 1006] || 11||  0.39%  ||  11 || style="text-align:left;" | || style="text-align:left;" |
 |-
-|[http://userweb.jlab.org/~rbziel/wikiplots/1157_25T_L/1157_25T_956_yield_mat11.gif 956] || 11||  1.3%  ||  20 || style="text-align:left;" | || style="text-align:left;" |
+|[http://userweb.jlab.org/~rbziel/wikiplots/1157_25T_L/1157_25T_956_yield_mat11.gif 956] || 11||  1.1%  ||  20 || style="text-align:left;" | || style="text-align:left;" |
 |-
 |[http://userweb.jlab.org/~rbziel/wikiplots/1157_25T_L/1157_25T_956_yield_mat14.gif 956] || 14||  0.04%  ||  2 || style="text-align:left;" | || style="text-align:left;" |
@@ Line 32: / Line 32: @@
 |[http://userweb.jlab.org/~rbziel/wikiplots/1157_25T_L/1157_25T_935_yield_mat11.gif 935] || 11||  0.63%  ||  18 || style="text-align:left;" | || style="text-align:left;" |
 |-
-|[http://userweb.jlab.org/~rbziel/wikiplots/1157_25T_L/1157_25T_898_yield_mat11.gif 898] || 11||  2.5%  ||  22 || style="text-align:left;" | || style="text-align:left;" |
+|[http://userweb.jlab.org/~rbziel/wikiplots/1157_25T_L/1157_25T_898_yield_mat11.gif 898] || 11||  2.5%  ||  22 || style="text-align:left;" |Last two runs contribute most to spread. It's also where beam x and beam y are most different from rest of values. The shift is ~0.5mm for both X/Y for those two runs.In MySQL there are no error bars on BPM info. || style="text-align:left;" |
 |-
 |[http://userweb.jlab.org/~rbziel/wikiplots/1157_25T_L/1157_25T_898_yield_mat14.gif 898] || 14||  0.01%  ||  2 || style="text-align:left;" | || style="text-align:left;" |
@@ Line 38: / Line 38: @@
 |[http://userweb.jlab.org/~rbziel/wikiplots/1157_25T_L/1157_25T_870_yield_mat11.gif 870] || 11||  0.9%  ||  12 || style="text-align:left;" |5101 had no L.rec.dp info so used L.gold.dp instead, 5095, 5101 has no BPM info in MySQL  || style="text-align:left;" |
 |-
-|[http://userweb.jlab.org/~rbziel/wikiplots/1157_25T_L/1157_25T_870_yield_mat13.gif 870] || 13||  10.0%  ||  19 || style="text-align:left;" | || style="text-align:left;" |
+|[http://userweb.jlab.org/~rbziel/wikiplots/1157_25T_L/1157_25T_870_yield_mat13.gif 870] || 13||  0.4%  ||  19 || style="text-align:left;" | || style="text-align:left;" |
 |-
-|[http://userweb.jlab.org/~rbziel/wikiplots/1157_25T_L/1157_25T_870_yield_mat14.gif 870] || 14||  2.8%  ||  3 || style="text-align:left;" | || style="text-align:left;" |
+|[http://userweb.jlab.org/~rbziel/wikiplots/1157_25T_L/1157_25T_870_yield_mat14.gif 870] || 14||  2.8%  ||  3 || style="text-align:left;" |Take one run and then come back much later and take two more. The second two are in disagreement with the first run. Beam X/Y are ~0.5mm different between the two sets of runs. The second set of runs also had a mismatched septum current on L/R HRS.|| style="text-align:left;" |
 |-
 |[http://userweb.jlab.org/~rbziel/wikiplots/1157_25T_L/1157_25T_844_yield_mat11.gif 844] || 11||  2.7%  ||  20 || style="text-align:left;" | || style="text-align:left;" |
 |-
-|[http://userweb.jlab.org/~rbziel/wikiplots/1157_25T_L/1157_25T_809_yield_mat14.gif 809] || 14||  3.8%  ||  20|| style="text-align:left;" | || style="text-align:left;" |
+|[http://userweb.jlab.org/~rbziel/wikiplots/1157_25T_L/1157_25T_844_yield_mat14.gif 844] || 14||  0.08%  ||  2 || style="text-align:left;" | || style="text-align:left;" |
 |-
-|[http://userweb.jlab.org/~rbziel/wikiplots/1157_25T_L/1157_25T_794_yield_mat11.gif 794] || 11||  2.2%  ||  16 || style="text-align:left;" | || style="text-align:left;" |
+|[http://userweb.jlab.org/~rbziel/wikiplots/1157_25T_L/1157_25T_809_yield_mat14.gif 809] || 14||  3.8%  ||  20|| style="text-align:left;" |Took 18 runs and then came back much later and took 2 more, the two additional runs contribute to the large spread. For the second set of runs, there is a mismatch in L/R septa currents. Target X changes by ~1mm for second set of runs. Target Y changes by ~0.2mm|| style="text-align:left;" |
 |-
-|[http://userweb.jlab.org/~rbziel/wikiplots/1157_25T_L/1157_25T_752_yield_mat14.gif 752] || 14||  5.2%  ||  16|| style="text-align:left;" | || style="text-align:left;" |
+|[http://userweb.jlab.org/~rbziel/wikiplots/1157_25T_L/1157_25T_794_yield_mat11.gif 794] || 11||  2.2%  ||  16 || style="text-align:left;" | Shifts in beam energy on the order of 0.5 MeV during runs due to Hall C running conditions. HALOG also says 3rd arm saw some beam scraping for some runs. Not sure if it's in the HRS too. || style="text-align:left;" |
 |-
-|[http://userweb.jlab.org/~rbziel/wikiplots/1157_25T_L/1157_25T_752_yield_mat14.gif 752] || 13||  0.6%  ||  14|| style="text-align:left;" | || style="text-align:left;" |
+|[http://userweb.jlab.org/~rbziel/wikiplots/1157_25T_L/1157_25T_794_yield_mat14.gif 794] || 14||  0.09%  ||  2 || style="text-align:left;" | || style="text-align:left;" |
+|-
+|[http://userweb.jlab.org/~rbziel/wikiplots/1157_25T_L/1157_25T_752_yield_mat14.gif 752] || 14||  5.2%  ||  16|| style="text-align:left;" | Took 14 runs and then came back much later and took 2 more, the two additional runs contribute to the large spread. Spread in first set of runs is ~2.5%. Target X changes ~1mm and Target Y changes ~0.5mm from first to second set of runs. There is also variation in first set of runs in beam position on the order of 0.5mm - 1.0mm.|| style="text-align:left;" |
+|-
+|[http://userweb.jlab.org/~rbziel/wikiplots/1157_25T_L/1157_25T_752_yield_mat13.gif 752] || 13||  0.6%  ||  14|| style="text-align:left;" | || style="text-align:left;" |
 |-
 |[http://userweb.jlab.org/~rbziel/wikiplots/1157_25T_L/1157_25T_746_yield_mat12.gif 746] || 12||  2.1%  ||  9 || style="text-align:left;" | || style="text-align:left;" |
+|-
+|[http://userweb.jlab.org/~rbziel/wikiplots/1157_25T_L/1157_25T_746_yield_mat14.gif 746] || 14||  0.07%  ||  2 || style="text-align:left;" | || style="text-align:left;" |
 |-
 |[http://userweb.jlab.org/~rbziel/wikiplots/1157_25T_L/1157_25T_701_yield_mat12.gif 701] || 12||  1.8%  ||  10 || style="text-align:left;" | || style="text-align:left;" |
@@ Line 66: / Line 72: @@
 |[http://userweb.jlab.org/~rbziel/wikiplots/1157_25T_L/1157_25T_619_yield_mat12.gif 619] || 12||  1.9%  ||  7 || style="text-align:left;" | || style="text-align:left;" |
 |-
-|[http://userweb.jlab.org/~rbziel/wikiplots/1157_25T_L/1157_25T_582_yield_mat12.gif 582] || 12||  4.1%  ||  9 || style="text-align:left;" | || style="text-align:left;" |
+|[http://userweb.jlab.org/~rbziel/wikiplots/1157_25T_L/1157_25T_582_yield_mat12.gif 582] || 12||  3.8%  ||  9 || style="text-align:left;" |First run is about a 1mm lower in target y and contributes most to spread || style="text-align:left;" |
 |-
 |[http://userweb.jlab.org/~rbziel/wikiplots/1157_25T_L/1157_25T_563_yield_mat14.gif 563] || 14||  0.23%  ||  2 || style="text-align:left;" | || style="text-align:left;" |
@@ Line 78: / Line 84: @@
 <small>More detailed 1.157GeV 2.5T Transverse left arm plots are available [http://userweb.jlab.org/~rbziel/wikiplots/1157_25T_L/ here] </small>
+{| {{table}} style="text-align:center"
+|+ '''Right Arm'''
+| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;width:75px"|''' HRS Momentum (MeV)  '''
+| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;width:75px"|''' Material #  '''
+| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;width:75px"|''' Spread (%)  '''
+| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;width:75px"|''' Runs '''
+| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0; width:200px "|''' Comments  '''
+| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0; width:400px "|''' Conclusion  '''
+|-
+|[http://userweb.jlab.org/~rbziel/wikiplots/1157_25T_R/1157_25TR_1017_yield2_mat11.gif 1017] || 11||  1.9%  ||  26 || style="text-align:left;" | || style="text-align:left;" |
+|-
+|
+|}
+<small>More detailed 1.157GeV 2.5T Transverse right arm plots are available [http://userweb.jlab.org/~rbziel/wikiplots/1157_25T_R/ here] </small>

Difference between revisions of "G2p 1157 25T"

Latest revision as of 11:32, 11 February 2015

Navigation menu

Views

Personal tools

Navigation

Search

Tools