|
|
| (162 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | For the 12 GeV DVCS experiment, go to [[https://hallaweb.jlab.org/wiki/index.php/DVCS3 DVCS3 wiki ]]. | + | For the 12 GeV DVCS experiment, go to [[https://hallaweb.jlab.org/wiki/index.php/DVCS3 DVCS3 wiki ]]. <br> |
| | | | |
| − | Assume:
| |
| − | <ul>
| |
| − | <li>longitudinally polarized beam
| |
| − | <li>max 20 uA but for short times when it can go higher
| |
| − | <li>7.3 GeV-4 pass and 5.5GeV-3Pass and possibly 9.10 GeV-5Pass later on
| |
| − | </ul>
| |
| | | | |
| − | == Commissioning/ Calibration ==
| + | For the Fall of 2016 (FY2017), we plan on taking the kinematics 36_2, 36_3 and as many of the 60_* ones as we can. |
| − | === Beam instruments ===
| + | |
| − | ==== BPM/Raster checks/Beam centering ====
| + | |
| − | <ol>
| + | |
| − | <li> Send unrastered beam to the four corners of a 2*2 mm square around assumed (0,0) position (as defined by RAD reading in beam dump). At each position compare harps against BPMs reading.
| + | |
| − | <li> ''JR: How to decide on beam centering beyond the RAD readings in the beam dump? Do we need to even go further than that?''
| + | |
| − | <li>Check size raster using the spot++ tool. Pending target boiling studies result, we will use a 2*2 mm2 raster.<br>
| + | |
| − | '' JR: Is it a matter to ask MCC for a 2*2 mm raster or does the info needs to go to them in a more "native" unit. Do we have a choice of frequency?'' | + | |
| − | </ol>
| + | |
| | | | |
| − | ==== BCMs====
| |
| − | Use the procedure that is under .....<br>
| |
| − | Need: To insure that minimal beam lost in the machine can be measured, beam that would go up to about 100 uA. We also need to be the only hall receiving beam.<br>
| |
| − | ''JR: Do we want to calibrate against the Unser monitor? Is the Unser operational? Do we know its calibration constant''
| |
| | | | |
| − | ==== Polarization measurement ====
| + | [[Image:Fall2016.jpg | 1200px]] |
| − | Goal ΔP/P~2%<br>
| + | |
| − | ''JR: How often do we want to measure the polarization? ''
| + | |
| − | For this fall:
| + | |
| − | At this time, we are hoping to be able to use the Compton as a beam quality monitor.
| + | |
| | | | |
| − | ==== Energy measurement ====
| + | [[Fall 2016 optic plans]] |
| − | Goal: Δ E/E ~ 0.5 %<br>
| + | |
| | | | |
| − | === Luminosity ===
| + | [[Fall 2016 calorimeter calibration (elastic)]] |
| − | ====Target Boiling ====
| + | |
| − | Check that the Carbon target doesn't boil. In similar conditions check if th hydrogen target does boil.
| + | |
| | | | |
| − | ====Deadtime check ====
| + | <hr> |
| − | The plan is to have multiple trigger that would let us check the deadtime. The cabling of these is yet to be defined.<br>
| + | <hr> |
| − | | + | <hr> |
| − | === HRS ===
| + | <hr> |
| − | | + | |
| − | ====Measure efficiencies S2m, Cerenkov and wire chamber ====
| + | |
| − | The DVCS trigger module can be triggered on any-two combination of s0, s1, s2 and the cerenkov. We should use this capability to measure the efficiency of the s2 and the cerenkov. We should double the study with using the MLU from the HRS.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | ====Optics====
| + | |
| − | The resolution of the calorimeter (about 3.5% in energy and 2mrad in angles) dominates the resolution of our experiment. So our optics needs are quite limited. In a first attempt we believe that it will be sufficient for our purpose to check that the target foils are reconstructed with about sigma=1.2mm/cos(spectro angle).
| + | |
| − | We might also want to measure and elastic point with the
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | === Calorimeter ===
| + | |
| − | ==== DC readings ====
| + | |
| − | === Elastic Calibration ===
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | ==Main DVCS kinematics==
| + | |
