Difference between revisions of "MOLLER Pion Background Meeting Wednesday, January 11, 2017 3:00pm EST"
From Hall A Wiki
(New page: MOLLER wiki home:MOLLER_at_11_GeV_E09-005 Previous Meeting: MOLLER_Pion_Background_Meeting_Wednesday,_November_30,_2016_3:00pm_EST =Meeting Information= BlueJeans Call Inform...) |
(→Minutes) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
=Minutes= | =Minutes= | ||
| − | Attendees: | + | Attendees: Kurtis, Wouter, Seamus |
| − | Not Attending: | + | Not Attending: KK(traveling), |
Scribe: Kurtis | Scribe: Kurtis | ||
| + | |||
| + | *Director's Review - Pion Detector Comments Review | ||
| + | ** Do we really need to include a separate generator for mu+mu- generation? | ||
| + | *** Maybe, depends on our true needs. Could approach it in a similar method to the Hall D generator. | ||
| + | *** Rakitha might already have the data in his older radiation studies. | ||
| + | ** Wouter: Should also merge Rakitha's shielding into the master then into the pion branch. | ||
| + | *** Seamus: Should consolidate the different unused branches back into master. | ||
| + | *** Wouter: Could split the geometry into a separate repo from the simulation. | ||
| + | ** Seamus: Maybe we should get rid of GDML and move to hard-coded geometry instead? | ||
| + | *** Wouter: Why, do you want to move to that? | ||
| + | *** Seamus: Having volume structure problems. | ||
| + | *** Wouter: Qweak, does that and it causes many many problems. | ||
| + | *** Rates and luminosities tend to cause problems in the hard-coded method. | ||
| + | *** Wouter: Important to keep geometry separate so that it can be moved to other frameworks. | ||
| + | **Upcoming simulation priorites | ||
| + | *** Lead wall thickness, pion detector geometry studies | ||
| + | *** Photo tracking in the pion detectors. Wouter will check on the status. | ||
| + | *** Port over the shielding to the main branch. | ||
| + | *** Ask Rakitha about which is the most recent shielding branch. | ||
Latest revision as of 17:13, 11 January 2017
MOLLER wiki home:MOLLER_at_11_GeV_E09-005
Previous Meeting: MOLLER_Pion_Background_Meeting_Wednesday,_November_30,_2016_3:00pm_EST
Meeting Information
BlueJeans Call Information
URL: https://bluejeans.com/624029893
Phone Number: 1-888-240-2560
Meeting ID: 624029893
Agenda
- Wouter: Detector concept in simulation
- Scott: Implementation of lead wall and strawman pion detector.
- Separate pion development branch
- Initial detector prototype.
- Jacob: Starting to work on pion simulations.
- David: present detector concept.
- Any new business?
Minutes
Attendees: Kurtis, Wouter, Seamus
Not Attending: KK(traveling),
Scribe: Kurtis
- Director's Review - Pion Detector Comments Review
- Do we really need to include a separate generator for mu+mu- generation?
- Maybe, depends on our true needs. Could approach it in a similar method to the Hall D generator.
- Rakitha might already have the data in his older radiation studies.
- Wouter: Should also merge Rakitha's shielding into the master then into the pion branch.
- Seamus: Should consolidate the different unused branches back into master.
- Wouter: Could split the geometry into a separate repo from the simulation.
- Seamus: Maybe we should get rid of GDML and move to hard-coded geometry instead?
- Wouter: Why, do you want to move to that?
- Seamus: Having volume structure problems.
- Wouter: Qweak, does that and it causes many many problems.
- Rates and luminosities tend to cause problems in the hard-coded method.
- Wouter: Important to keep geometry separate so that it can be moved to other frameworks.
- Upcoming simulation priorites
- Lead wall thickness, pion detector geometry studies
- Photo tracking in the pion detectors. Wouter will check on the status.
- Port over the shielding to the main branch.
- Ask Rakitha about which is the most recent shielding branch.
- Do we really need to include a separate generator for mu+mu- generation?
