Difference between revisions of "Agenda and Minutes for 2011/02/23"
From Hall A Wiki
(New page: Seamus: First SoLID BaBar PVDIS efficiency results: [http://www.jlab.org/~riordan/20110223/riordan_20110223.pdf]) |
(Link to new wiki) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | This page has been moved to [https://solid.jlab.org/wiki/index.php/Agenda_and_Minutes_for_2011/02/23 https://solid.jlab.org/wiki/index.php/Agenda_and_Minutes_for_2011/02/23] in the new [https://solid.jlab.org/wiki SoLID Wiki]. Please do not edit this page. | |
− | + | ||
+ | * progress | ||
+ | ** Zhiwen has fixed the problem of soliddb with CC. please report any further problem. | ||
+ | ** Both Zhiwen and Seamus did some acceptance study of the baffle,(refer to [[Solid_Baffle]]), to Eugene's configuration. The results between Seamus and Zhiwen are understandable if we are comparing the positive particle bending. The main surprise is Zhiwen sees large gamma acceptance about 40% while it should be about 20% according to emails between Eugene and Paul. The other difference is summarized on the wiki. Seamus will try to confirm Zhiwen's result. Zhiwen will try to contact Eugene to find out detailed info. | ||
+ | ** Simona is working on SIDIS Cerenkov and target geometry. | ||
+ | ** Lorenzo has put chargedgeantino (positive) and geantino (neutron) in the event generator. | ||
+ | |||
+ | *note: | ||
+ | ** We had some discussion about how to develop solid simulation with gemc. Seamus has put [[solgemc Installation Instructions]] and | ||
+ | Zhiwen put up some [[thought on solid gemc developing]], We shall discuss them further, maybe during next solid SIDIS collbration meeting on 3/25 | ||
+ | ** The root file output needs some additional work. Zhiwen didn't realize the "banks" program has to be changed manually each time for every single banks. Either we rewrite the banks program to make it more automatic or we add the output to root in gemc directly. Zhiwen has looked a little bit into gemc source code for the second way, it seems not very hard, but need to confirm with Mauri if there are additional obstacles and why that's done at the first place. |
Latest revision as of 15:40, 7 December 2020
This page has been moved to https://solid.jlab.org/wiki/index.php/Agenda_and_Minutes_for_2011/02/23 in the new SoLID Wiki. Please do not edit this page.
- progress
- Zhiwen has fixed the problem of soliddb with CC. please report any further problem.
- Both Zhiwen and Seamus did some acceptance study of the baffle,(refer to Solid_Baffle), to Eugene's configuration. The results between Seamus and Zhiwen are understandable if we are comparing the positive particle bending. The main surprise is Zhiwen sees large gamma acceptance about 40% while it should be about 20% according to emails between Eugene and Paul. The other difference is summarized on the wiki. Seamus will try to confirm Zhiwen's result. Zhiwen will try to contact Eugene to find out detailed info.
- Simona is working on SIDIS Cerenkov and target geometry.
- Lorenzo has put chargedgeantino (positive) and geantino (neutron) in the event generator.
- note:
- We had some discussion about how to develop solid simulation with gemc. Seamus has put solgemc Installation Instructions and
Zhiwen put up some thought on solid gemc developing, We shall discuss them further, maybe during next solid SIDIS collbration meeting on 3/25
- The root file output needs some additional work. Zhiwen didn't realize the "banks" program has to be changed manually each time for every single banks. Either we rewrite the banks program to make it more automatic or we add the output to root in gemc directly. Zhiwen has looked a little bit into gemc source code for the second way, it seems not very hard, but need to confirm with Mauri if there are additional obstacles and why that's done at the first place.