Difference between revisions of "Shielding hut for GEM electronics"

From Hall A Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(22 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 7: Line 7:
 
* 12GEp_Plan [https://userweb.jlab.org/~dasuni/GEM_Electronic_hut/12GEp_Plan.png]
 
* 12GEp_Plan [https://userweb.jlab.org/~dasuni/GEM_Electronic_hut/12GEp_Plan.png]
  
Few extra details from Alan,
+
Few extra details from Alan Gavalya,
 
* The green boxes are cast steel 52" x 52" x 26".
 
* The green boxes are cast steel 52" x 52" x 26".
 
* The distance between two green boxes are 96".
 
* The distance between two green boxes are 96".
* There is a steel plates between two green boxes (bottom-2.5" thick & front-7.5" thick). The bottom plate allows for the front plates to match the height of the green blocks for stacking the top plates.
+
* There are two steel plates between two green boxes (bottom-2.5" thick & front-7.5" thick). The bottom plate allows for the front plates to match the height of the green blocks for stacking the top plates.
 
* And there is a steel plate (120" x 5" x 43") on the top (blue).
 
* And there is a steel plate (120" x 5" x 43") on the top (blue).
  
 
The drawings for the magnet support frame (by Alan) -[https://userweb.jlab.org/~dasuni/GEM_Electronic_hut/A00000-15-05-0201%20revA%20sht1-6.pdf]
 
The drawings for the magnet support frame (by Alan) -[https://userweb.jlab.org/~dasuni/GEM_Electronic_hut/A00000-15-05-0201%20revA%20sht1-6.pdf]
  
The supporting frame and the sheilding hut were added to the g4sbs/src/G4SBSHArmBuilder.cc - [https://userweb.jlab.org/~dasuni/GEM_Electronic_hut/G4SBSHArmBuilder.cc], See under MakeHCAL.
+
The supporting frame and the shielding hut were added to the g4sbs/src/G4SBSHArmBuilder.cc - [https://userweb.jlab.org/~dasuni/GEM_Electronic_hut/G4SBSHArmBuilder.cc], See under MakeHCAL.
  
And here the shielding hut and supporting frame appear on the g4sbs at the moment - [https://userweb.jlab.org/~dasuni/GEM_Electronic_hut/GEMElec_bg_study_MAR17.pdf]
+
And this is how the shielding hut and supporting frame appear on the g4sbs - [https://userweb.jlab.org/~dasuni/GEM_Electronic_hut/GEMElec_bg_study_MAR17.pdf]. See page 3 & 4.
 +
[[Image:shielding_hut.png]]
 
-----------------
 
-----------------
 
-----------------
 
-----------------
* First, we wanted to compare the gamma yields with Pavel's to cross-check the overall normalization.
+
* First, we wanted to compare the gamma yields with Pavel Degtiarenko's to cross-check the overall normalization.
** The are the latest plots from Pavel's [https://userweb.jlab.org/~dasuni/GEM_Electronic_hut/st_e11000_th40cm_a1%281%29.pdf]. These simulations include exact GEp target configuration (40 cm Liquid H2 + Al walls).
+
** These are the latest plots from Pavel's [https://userweb.jlab.org/~dasuni/GEM_Electronic_hut/st_e11000_th40cm_a1%281%29.pdf]. These simulations include exact GEp target configuration (40 cm Liquid H2 + Al walls).
** And this is what we got by running our simulations [https://userweb.jlab.org/~dasuni/GEM_Electronic_hut/Yields_Compared_to_Pavels_NewSim_with_vacuum.pdf]. Each slide shows the results from g4sbs (on top - when the hall A is filled with Air (left) and Vacuum (right) and on the bottom - results from Pavel's when the hall is vacuum.)
+
** And this is what we got by running our simulations [https://userweb.jlab.org/~dasuni/GEM_Electronic_hut/Yields_Compared_to_Pavels_NewSim_with_vacuum.pdf]. Each slide shows the results from g4sbs (on top - when the hall is filled with Air (left) and Vacuum (right) and on the bottom - results from Pavel's when the hall is in vacuum.)
 
-----------------
 
-----------------
 
-----------------
 
-----------------
Line 28: Line 29:
 
** To do that, we defined a volume inside the hut and made it a sensitive detector.
 
** To do that, we defined a volume inside the hut and made it a sensitive detector.
 
** And filled it with air (and water), and calculate the dose based on energy deposited on that volume.
 
** And filled it with air (and water), and calculate the dose based on energy deposited on that volume.
 +
<math>\text{Dose } (rad) = \sum \frac{\text{edep }(MeV)}{\text{Volume }(cm^2) \times \text{Density } (gcm^{-3}) \times 6.24\times 10^7 } </math>
 +
where 6.24x10^7 is the conversion factor of '''MeV/g''' to '''rad'''.
 +
-----------------
 +
-----------------
 +
* Finally, we want to calculate the neutron-induced damage inside the shielding hut.
 +
** The effective damage to silicon detectors relative to 1 MeV neutron can be found at [http://arxiv.org/pdf/1207.3743.pdf]. See figure 1.

Latest revision as of 09:53, 9 September 2016

The main purpose of this study to determine the neutron-induced damage on electronics at the shielding hut for GEp.



Main drawings for the shielding hut are,

  • 12GEp_Elevation [1]
  • 12GEp_Iso [2]
  • 12GEp_Plan [3]

Few extra details from Alan Gavalya,

  • The green boxes are cast steel 52" x 52" x 26".
  • The distance between two green boxes are 96".
  • There are two steel plates between two green boxes (bottom-2.5" thick & front-7.5" thick). The bottom plate allows for the front plates to match the height of the green blocks for stacking the top plates.
  • And there is a steel plate (120" x 5" x 43") on the top (blue).

The drawings for the magnet support frame (by Alan) -[4]

The supporting frame and the shielding hut were added to the g4sbs/src/G4SBSHArmBuilder.cc - [5], See under MakeHCAL.

And this is how the shielding hut and supporting frame appear on the g4sbs - [6]. See page 3 & 4. Shielding hut.png



  • First, we wanted to compare the gamma yields with Pavel Degtiarenko's to cross-check the overall normalization.
    • These are the latest plots from Pavel's [7]. These simulations include exact GEp target configuration (40 cm Liquid H2 + Al walls).
    • And this is what we got by running our simulations [8]. Each slide shows the results from g4sbs (on top - when the hall is filled with Air (left) and Vacuum (right) and on the bottom - results from Pavel's when the hall is in vacuum.)


  • Next thing on the list is to calculate the energy deposited/dose/dose rate inside the shielding hut.
    • To do that, we defined a volume inside the hut and made it a sensitive detector.
    • And filled it with air (and water), and calculate the dose based on energy deposited on that volume.
<math>\text{Dose } (rad) = \sum \frac{\text{edep }(MeV)}{\text{Volume }(cm^2) \times \text{Density } (gcm^{-3}) \times 6.24\times 10^7 } </math>

where 6.24x10^7 is the conversion factor of MeV/g to rad.



  • Finally, we want to calculate the neutron-induced damage inside the shielding hut.
    • The effective damage to silicon detectors relative to 1 MeV neutron can be found at [9]. See figure 1.