Difference between revisions of "Wednesday November 1, 2017 3:00pm ET"

From Hall A Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Minutes)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 27: Line 27:
 
* Preparation for MOLLER tracking meeting - status
 
* Preparation for MOLLER tracking meeting - status
 
** Need to go back to reviewers and ask what they meant, if we need to
 
** Need to go back to reviewers and ask what they meant, if we need to
 +
** create a timeline for next 6 months
 
** Radiation dose estimates/material irradiation [https://hallaweb.jlab.org/wiki/images/1/18/Coil_scan_summary.pdf  summary]
 
** Radiation dose estimates/material irradiation [https://hallaweb.jlab.org/wiki/images/1/18/Coil_scan_summary.pdf  summary]
 +
*** have located some "hot spots"
 +
*** need to convert to doses
 +
*** compare to radiation hardness for various materials (epoxy, insulating tape)
 +
*** quantify known materials, is it good enough for MOLLER
 
** Upstream sensitivity studies [https://hallaweb.jlab.org/wiki/images/c/c4/Spectrometer_update_11-1-2017.pdf summary]
 
** Upstream sensitivity studies [https://hallaweb.jlab.org/wiki/images/c/c4/Spectrometer_update_11-1-2017.pdf summary]
 
** Beamline fringe field effects  
 
** Beamline fringe field effects  
Line 35: Line 40:
 
**** heat load on hot day - just run hotter
 
**** heat load on hot day - just run hotter
 
**** we need to cool our water anyway - our refrigerator design
 
**** we need to cool our water anyway - our refrigerator design
*** floor loading - probably not a concern (each component less than what crane can list)  
+
*** floor loading - probably not a concern (each component less than what crane can lift)  
 +
**** spring of '18 - would floor sagging affect physics?
 +
**** shielding around target bigger issue
 +
**** dialogue between MIT and survey group
 +
**** does target sinking affect rest of experiment?
 +
** beamline - Silviu's designer
 +
*** downstream of vacuum vessel - exit window
 +
*** coupling between vacuum vessel and beamline
 +
* Also need to remember things that we want to keep working on that aren't on the list
 +
** collimator supports
 +
*** movable collimator - needs work - concept based on SLAC design
 +
*** need space where shielding might exist right now
 +
*** linear stage and hard stop
 +
** water-cooled collimator
 +
*** same system as coils
 +
*** feasibility with cooling and physics
 +
** budgetary bids only
 +
** upstream vacuum vessel
 +
*** inner-photon collimator - independent of motion of chambers
 
* Test coil status/homework
 
* Test coil status/homework
** Objectives
+
** Conductor needs to be straightened before it can be used
** Test plan
+
** Test plan/schedule
** Schedule
+
*** thermal tests with thermal gun
 +
*** temperatures, flow rates as power ramped up
 +
*** field measurements
 +
*** keystoning - we will see during manufacture
 +
*** stiffness of coil - surveying to look at sagging, etc.
 +
*** eddy currents and additional cavitation - would need to run for too long so no
 +
* blocky model for new coils
 
* Next meeting
 
* Next meeting
  
 
<br><br>
 
<br><br>

Latest revision as of 16:11, 1 November 2017

Last meeting: Wednesday October 18, 2017 2:00pm ET


Agenda



  • Preparation for MOLLER tracking meeting - status
    • Radiation dose estimates/material irradiation summary
    • Upstream sensitivity studies summary
    • Beamline fringe field effects
    • MIT activities
      • impact of environmental variations
      • floor loading
  • Test coil status/homework
    • Objectives
    • Test plan
    • Schedule
  • Next meeting



Minutes

Attended: Juliette, Seamus, Cameron, Jim, Ernie, KK

  • Preparation for MOLLER tracking meeting - status
    • Need to go back to reviewers and ask what they meant, if we need to
    • create a timeline for next 6 months
    • Radiation dose estimates/material irradiation summary
      • have located some "hot spots"
      • need to convert to doses
      • compare to radiation hardness for various materials (epoxy, insulating tape)
      • quantify known materials, is it good enough for MOLLER
    • Upstream sensitivity studies summary
    • Beamline fringe field effects
    • MIT activities
      • impact of environmental variations
        • expanding and contracting uniformly (that's how water system is being designed)
        • heat load on hot day - just run hotter
        • we need to cool our water anyway - our refrigerator design
      • floor loading - probably not a concern (each component less than what crane can lift)
        • spring of '18 - would floor sagging affect physics?
        • shielding around target bigger issue
        • dialogue between MIT and survey group
        • does target sinking affect rest of experiment?
    • beamline - Silviu's designer
      • downstream of vacuum vessel - exit window
      • coupling between vacuum vessel and beamline
  • Also need to remember things that we want to keep working on that aren't on the list
    • collimator supports
      • movable collimator - needs work - concept based on SLAC design
      • need space where shielding might exist right now
      • linear stage and hard stop
    • water-cooled collimator
      • same system as coils
      • feasibility with cooling and physics
    • budgetary bids only
    • upstream vacuum vessel
      • inner-photon collimator - independent of motion of chambers
  • Test coil status/homework
    • Conductor needs to be straightened before it can be used
    • Test plan/schedule
      • thermal tests with thermal gun
      • temperatures, flow rates as power ramped up
      • field measurements
      • keystoning - we will see during manufacture
      • stiffness of coil - surveying to look at sagging, etc.
      • eddy currents and additional cavitation - would need to run for too long so no
  • blocky model for new coils
  • Next meeting