Difference between revisions of "April 14 2011 Meeting Summary"
From Hall A Wiki
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
# last three runs for 739 R Fe 60, fix the highest and lowest points. | # last three runs for 739 R Fe 60, fix the highest and lowest points. | ||
# For left arm, at high energy, we might be not necessary to use NaI E/p and Geo Cut. | # For left arm, at high energy, we might be not necessary to use NaI E/p and Geo Cut. | ||
− | # For left arm | + | # For left arm low energy, first get 3 points cs, Then remove NaI E/p and Geo Cut to compare it. |
# Continue "To do list" in [[March 31 2011 Meeting Summary]] | # Continue "To do list" in [[March 31 2011 Meeting Summary]] |
Revision as of 10:46, 19 April 2011
Back to CSR Weekly Meeting on 2011
- xinhu: [NaI bad block correction check]
- hyao: [RHRS New Acceptance and LHRS New Acceptance with New SAMC RZ generator]
xinhu:
- Correct most events back. But still not good for Box3.
hyao:
- 21612 has problem.
- Low energy Cross Section fluctuation < 3~4%.
- Left arm cross section is not good.
To do list:
xinhu:
- For NaI Eff, make geometry dependent cut efficiency(select pure electron sample) for NaI.
- Weight the event by this geo-dep eff when calculating the cross section.
- calculate the efficiency for bad block region(select the events in bad block region and add different E/P cuts to see the efficiency changing)
- pi rejection for low momentum .
- the efficiency for low momentum is a little complex than high momentum due to contamination of electron sample
hyao:
- Try 600,700 Acceptance. See the difference.
- For low energy, 300-400 MeV, fix the highest point for xs.
- last three runs for 739 R Fe 60, fix the highest and lowest points.
- For left arm, at high energy, we might be not necessary to use NaI E/p and Geo Cut.
- For left arm low energy, first get 3 points cs, Then remove NaI E/p and Geo Cut to compare it.
- Continue "To do list" in March 31 2011 Meeting Summary