Difference between revisions of "Cryo-target wall contamination"

From Hall A Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Kinematic 5.2)
(Kinematic 6.5)
Line 60: Line 60:
 
| 0.0274 cm
 
| 0.0274 cm
 
| 0.0328 cm
 
| 0.0328 cm
| ?E+8
+
| 1.045E+9
| ?
+
| 110050
 
|-
 
|-
 
| Dummy
 
| Dummy
 
| 0.1581 cm
 
| 0.1581 cm
 
| 0.1585 cm
 
| 0.1585 cm
| ?E+8
+
| 1.316E+7
| ?
+
| 294
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
  
Result: An estimate of ? events wall events remains within the cut ==> Contamination is less than ?%.
+
Result: An estimate of 4439 events wall events remains within the cut ==> Contamination is 4%.
  
  

Revision as of 20:18, 28 April 2011

The normalized yield is equal to Ngood/Q/density. Here I neglected the density of the 3He gas.


Kinematic 5.2

Target window thickness Total charge # of good evts
upstream downstream
He3 0.0274 cm 0.0328 cm 6.92E+8 253254
Dummy 0.1581 cm 0.1585 cm 2.16E+8 3588

Result: An estimate of 2186 events wall events remains within the cut ==> Contamination is less than 1%.


He3 5.2 all.gif

Dummy 5.2 all.gif


Kinematic 6.5

Target window thickness Total charge # of good evts
upstream downstream
He3 0.0274 cm 0.0328 cm 1.045E+9 110050
Dummy 0.1581 cm 0.1585 cm 1.316E+7 294

Result: An estimate of 4439 events wall events remains within the cut ==> Contamination is 4%.


He3 6.5 all.gif

Dummy 6.5 all.gif