Revision as of 14:05, 27 November 2012

some estimation

PVDIS

50uA, 
LH target, 50cm, 0.071g/cm3, X=50/890.4=5.6e-2, Lumi=50e-6/1.6e-19*50*0.071*6.02e23=0.67e39/cm2/s
LD target, 50cm, 0.169g/cm3, X=50/745.4=6.7e-2, Lumi=50e-6/1.6e-19*50*0.169*6.02e23=1.59e39/cm2/s
Al window, 2*100um, density 2.7g/cm3, X=2*100e-4/8.897=2.25e-3, Lumi=50e-6/1.6e-19*2*100e-4*2.7*6.02e23=1e37/cm2/s

SIDIS 3he

15uA
3he(10amg), 40cm, density=10*44.6(amg=mol/m3)*3.016(g/mol)=1.345e-3g/cm3, X=40/(67.42/1.345e-3)=0.8e-3, Lumi=15e-6/1.6e-19*40*1.345e-3*6.02e23=3e36/cm2/s
GE180 glass window, 2*120um, density 2.76g/cm3, X=2*120e-4/(19.4/2.76)=3.4e-3, Lumi=15e-6/1.6e-19*2*120e-4*2.76*6.02e23=3.7e36/cm2/s

SIDIS proton

100nA
NH3

JPsi

3uA
LH target, 15cm, 0.071g/cm3, X=15/890.4=1.7e-2, Lumi=3e-6/1.6e-19*15*0.071*6.02e23=1.2e37/cm2/s
Al window, 2*100um, density 2.7g/cm3, X=2*100e-4/8.897=2.25e-3, Lumi=3e-6/1.6e-19*2*100e-4*2.7*6.02e23=6e35/cm2/s

PVDIS Geant4 modeled background from Target

Rates and flux from GEMC for PVDIS follow. Validation against GEANT3 can be found here: Compare_to_geant3_result.

Rates on GEMs for 50uA on LH2. Solid lines are unbaffled, dashed are with lead baffles:

Flux in EM calorimeter for 50uA on LH2. Solid lines are unbaffled, dashed are with lead baffles. The true rate should be taken from the black lines.

SIDIS Geant4 modeled background from Target

<math>\pi</math>/e Ratio

See here