Difference between revisions of "More information can be found here"
(→Current (optimized) matrices) |
(→Current (optimized) matrices) |
||
| Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
This is the coefficient that relates delta with theta x' fp linearly. We did this to get rid of a slope we saw in Emiss vs. xptar. | This is the coefficient that relates delta with theta x' fp linearly. We did this to get rid of a slope we saw in Emiss vs. xptar. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Image:Screen Shot 2018-07-27 at 11.27.02 AM.png|500px|center]] | ||
'''[6] [http://web.mit.edu/reynier/www/Tritium_optics_matrices/LHRS_slope_fixed.html matrix with Emiss vs. xptar slope fixed]''' | '''[6] [http://web.mit.edu/reynier/www/Tritium_optics_matrices/LHRS_slope_fixed.html matrix with Emiss vs. xptar slope fixed]''' | ||
| Line 52: | Line 54: | ||
'''[7] [http://web.mit.edu/reynier/www/Tritium_optics_matrices/LHRS_current_optics.html current LHRS matrix]''' | '''[7] [http://web.mit.edu/reynier/www/Tritium_optics_matrices/LHRS_current_optics.html current LHRS matrix]''' | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
=== RHRS === | === RHRS === | ||
Latest revision as of 16:43, 10 August 2018
Contents
Old matrices
The following are the matrices that we used during the online analysis of the experiment:
[1] LHRS default matrix - I cannot find this file. Might be able to retrieve it from github, but it would only be here for legacy reasons.
Optimization steps
LHRS
The following is the LHRS matrix optimized by GMp
The following is an optimization that Shujie did on the GMp LHRS matrix [3] using the standard procedure for optimizing the angles and the sieve runs taken during MARATHON.
[4] LHRS re-optimization by Shujie
Details on Shujie's optimization here
RHRS
The following is the RHRS matrix optimized by GMp
Current (optimized) matrices
LHRS
Replaced in matrix [4] the line:
D 1 0 0 -6.863500E-02 2.633700E-01 1.096600E-02 -7.253300E-02
with:
D 1 0 0 4.932426E-03 2.633700E-01 1.096600E-02 -7.253300E-02
This is the coefficient that relates delta with theta x' fp linearly. We did this to get rid of a slope we saw in Emiss vs. xptar.
[6] matrix with Emiss vs. xptar slope fixed
Last but not least, the term Y 0 0 0 2.670000E-03 was introduced to shift the LHRS ytar distribution. This was decided because, when plotting LHRS vz - RHRS vz for a coincidence cut, the coincidence peak was shifted from 0.
RHRS
Replaced in matrix [5] the line:
D 0 0 0 1.816209E-03 8.382911E-02 7.297953E-03 3.822568E-03 1.149510E-02
with:
D 0 0 0 6.146531E-04 8.382911E-02 7.297953E-03 3.822568E-03 1.149510E-02
and added the following two lines:
T 0 0 0 -2.940000E-03
P 0 0 0 -1.567257E-03
These are overall constant shifts introduced by looking at hydrogen data to shift distributions to where there physical values should be (i.e. W 937 -> 938.27 MeV)
