Difference between revisions of "Meeting 2022 10 12"

From Hall A Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Update on BB GEMs)
(Update on BB GEMs)
Line 16: Line 16:
 
===  Update on BB GEMs ===
 
===  Update on BB GEMs ===
 
* [https://sbs.jlab.org/cgi-bin/DocDB/private/ShowDocument?docid=322 GEN GEM Update]
 
* [https://sbs.jlab.org/cgi-bin/DocDB/private/ShowDocument?docid=322 GEN GEM Update]
 +
* Many DAQ issues overnight, see presentation above
 +
* Likely something with INFN LV
  
 
=== Update on layers for GEn-RP ===
 
=== Update on layers for GEn-RP ===

Revision as of 10:31, 12 October 2022

GMn GEM commissioning Meetings: WEDNESDAY 10:30am - 11:30am

Link to all previous meetings: GMn GEM Commissioning Meeting

Please use sbs_gems mailing list for plots/communications and HALOG entries relevant to GEMs!


Near term work plan

  • see the GEM commissioning run plan for GEn-II here: [1] [2]
  • Thoughts on special run requests during GEn:
    • Luminosity studies
    • Full readout studies for negative pulse studies
    • HV efficiency scans with beam

Update on BB GEMs

  • GEN GEM Update
  • Many DAQ issues overnight, see presentation above
  • Likely something with INFN LV

Update on layers for GEn-RP

  • Alignment/latency/tracking issues
    • SBS GEM latency was incorrectly set at the beginning of the experiment, by using the latency we used for the cosmic paddle trigger - 76
    • The very first day of the GEM commissioning we got more confused as we got some tracks in the SBS GEMs using this latency. Probably this is from background as tracking on the SBS side wasn't done using the calorimeter constraints that time.
    • But when the calorimeter constraints were turned on, we got just only 10's of tracks for like 150K trigger events.
    • Had a discussion with Alex yesterday and we agreed starting around the BB GEM latency (112 now) and scanning around it would be a good place to start. The reasons are:
      • BB and SBS GEMs have the same HDMI cable lengths. SBS INFN GEMs have longer cable lengths but we know how much of an offset they are.
      • BBCal and HCal trigger are well aligned latency component we get from that are similar for BB GEMs and SBS GEMs.
      • TOF difference between electrons reaching BBCal and protons reaching HCal is ~50 ns. So ~ 2 latency units. But SBS GEMs are quite closer to the target than HCal so this difference is probably even less.
      • So the only "significant" difference, as we understand, is between the MPD trigger cable length difference in BB and SBS GEMs.
      • Plan is to identify this difference by scoping BB and SBS GEM MPD trigger at the MPD-end today when the Hall reconfiguration is done.
      • BB GEM latency +/- BB and SBS GEM MPD trig time difference => Where the SBS GEM latency should be to the first order.
  • gas

Update monitoring with new GEMs in GEn-RP

  • replay times with tracking

DAQ updates (Ben, Bryan, Alex)