Difference between revisions of "Preparations-DOE2014-Nov-Review"
From Hall A Wiki
m |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
****DOE SBS Nov 2013 monthly report included the work flow for GEM module construction to include workforce (by type). | ****DOE SBS Nov 2013 monthly report included the work flow for GEM module construction to include workforce (by type). | ||
****Need Evaristo and Nilanga to update. | ****Need Evaristo and Nilanga to update. | ||
| − | *** | + | ***Develop a written Quality Assurance/test plan, including acceptance criteria for foils and assembled chambers that will be used for both UVa and INFN. |
****Need Evaristo and Nilanga to create. | ****Need Evaristo and Nilanga to create. | ||
***Conduct a background assessment for each experimental program that includes background rejection and signal efficiency as a function of trigger cuts, and present at the next review. | ***Conduct a background assessment for each experimental program that includes background rejection and signal efficiency as a function of trigger cuts, and present at the next review. | ||
Revision as of 16:01, 22 August 2014
- Documentation for Reviewers
- Final report from DOE Nov 2013 SBS review.
- DOE Nov 2013 recommendations with responses.
- Update the work flow for GEM module construction to include workforce (by type) required for each step.
- DOE SBS Nov 2013 monthly report included the work flow for GEM module construction to include workforce (by type).
- Need Evaristo and Nilanga to update.
- Develop a written Quality Assurance/test plan, including acceptance criteria for foils and assembled chambers that will be used for both UVa and INFN.
- Need Evaristo and Nilanga to create.
- Conduct a background assessment for each experimental program that includes background rejection and signal efficiency as a function of trigger cuts, and present at the next review.
- Seamus is leading the effort.
- Develop a document describing the interface between the DAQ system and each of the 3 types of electronics (FADC, GEM, and FASTBUS) and present at the next review.
- Alexandre is leading the effort.
- Integration milestones for all equipment off-project, as well as key JLAB readiness and safety reviews, should be incorporated into the list of milestones. Provide updated list of milestones to DOE by January 1, 2014.
- List of milestones for off-project equipment dependencies was sent to DOE in Nov 2013 monthly report.
- Develop a Technical Specifications Document for all experimental components in the SBS program and present it at the next annual review.
- Need from each set of equipment a list of technical specs.
- Develop an integration plan for all experimental components (on and off project) needed for the SBS program, which includes activities, schedules and goals.
- Update the Research Management Plan to capture current plans for scientific effort needed to implement the project.
- Research Management Plan. Updated and sent to DOE in Jan 2014 Monthly report.
- Need one-page activity report from each group to be sent to Brian Quinn
- The Project Management Plan should be updated to reflect changes in scope to the WBS components and evolving list of off-project equipment.
- Program Management Plan. Updated to include PMT based Coordinate Detector and list of off-project equipment dependencies and submitted to DOE in Jan 2014.
- Update the work flow for GEM module construction to include workforce (by type) required for each step.
- DOE SBS Monthly reports
- Technical Detector Reports
- The concept and main characteristics of the PMT-based Coordinate Detector by L. Pentchev and B. Wojtsekhowski.
- SBS Gas Electron Multiplier (GEM) Chamber pre-R&D Report by University of Virginia.
- Prototype APV-‐25 readout system for the SBS back GEM tracker by University of Virginia.
- Comparison report of GEM readout systems by University of Virginia.
- APV-25 based readout electronics for the SBS front GEM tracker by INFN
