Difference between revisions of "More details here"

From Hall A Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Calibration during online analysis)
(Calibration by Tyler Hague)
Line 44: Line 44:
 
Lrb.Raster2.raw2posT = -0.00651754 0.00637652 6.44224e-08 -8.23136e-08 0.0 0.0
 
Lrb.Raster2.raw2posT = -0.00651754 0.00637652 6.44224e-08 -8.23136e-08 0.0 0.0
  
=== Calibration by Tyler Hague ===
+
=== Calibration #1 by Tyler Hague ===
 +
- ([https://hallaweb.jlab.org/wiki/images/a/a2/180723_Raster_Calibration.pdf calibration #1 here]):
  
 
- done on 18/07/05  
 
- done on 18/07/05  
 +
 
- here he fits the carbon hole using run 100023, and forces the center of the hole to be at (0,0)
 
- here he fits the carbon hole using run 100023, and forces the center of the hole to be at (0,0)
 +
 +
[ 2018-04-12 10:00:00 -0500 ]
 +
 +
Lrb.Raster.raw2posA = -0.00370596 0.00886556 5.01537e-08 -1.2279e-07 0.0 0.0
 +
 +
Lrb.Raster.raw2posB = -0.00589208 0.00713621 6.26247e-08 -9.32498e-08 0.0 0.0
 +
 +
Lrb.Raster.raw2posT = -0.00621872 0.00755727 8.48732e-08 -1.08002e-07 0.0 0.0
 +
 +
[ 2018-04-12 10:00:00 -0500 ]
 +
 +
Lrb.Raster2.raw2posA = -0.00345833 0.00861078 4.73207e-08 -1.22232e-07 0.0 0.0
 +
 +
Lrb.Raster2.raw2posB = -0.00558288 0.00694272 5.90872e-08 -9.28256e-08 0.0 0.0
 +
 +
Lrb.Raster2.raw2posT = -0.00575922 0.00738865 7.96539e-08 -1.08382e-07 0.0 0.0
 +
 +
=== Calibration #2 by Tyler Hague ===
 +
- ([https://hallaweb.jlab.org/wiki/images/a/a2/180723_Raster_Calibration.pdf calibration #2 here]):
 +
 +
- done on 18/07/20
 +
 +
- Here he fits the carbon hole using run 100100. He only uses the radius of the carbon hole to get the slope of the position-current conversion, but he does not force the center of the carbon hole to be at (0,0). Instead, he gets the coordinates of the carbon hole at the target by projecting a line through the position at the BPMs.
 +
 +
[ 2018-04-12 10:00:00 -0500 ]
 +
 +
Lrb.Raster.raw2posA = -0.00307245 0.00835144 4.08794e-08 -1.16358e-07 0.0 0.0
 +
 +
Lrb.Raster.raw2posB = -0.00520763 0.00666433 5.23307e-08 -8.70783e-08 0.0 0.0
 +
 +
Lrb.Raster.raw2posT = -0.00859591 0.0093233 9.15847e-08 -1.21017e-07 0.0 0.0
 +
 +
[ 2018-04-12 10:00:00 -0500 ]
 +
Lrb.Raster2.raw2posA = -0.00287198 0.00812136 3.85685e-08 -1.15989e-07 0.0 0.0
 +
 +
Lrb.Raster2.raw2posB = -0.004951 0.00649214 4.93724e-08 -8.68025e-08 0.0 0.0
 +
 +
Lrb.Raster2.raw2posT = -0.00853784 0.00943896 9.19146e-08 -1.25635e-07 0.0 0.0

Revision as of 14:29, 28 July 2018

(BACK TO THE MAIN PAGE)

The raster calibration is beam energy dependent. Thus, we need specialized calibrations for our second pass beam. Only the FADC 'Left' rasters (1 & 2) are calibrated, since we are not using the other ones (FastBus L,R, and FADC R).

Current Raster Calibration

Current calibration (calibration #3 here):

[ 2018-04-12 10:00:00 -0500 ]

Lrb.Raster.raw2posA = -0.004435541 -0.01307883 5.983839e-08 1.783232e-07 0.0 0.0

Lrb.Raster.raw2posB = -0.006952554 -0.009373377 7.660049e-08 1.334512e-07 0.0 0.0

Lrb.Raster.raw2posT = -0.0081779 0.008993548 8.577028e-08 -1.164829e-07 0.0 0.0

[ 2018-04-12 10:00:00 -0500 ]

Lrb.Raster2.raw2posA = -0.004374697 -0.01289406 5.973142e-08 1.801236e-07 0.0 0.0

Lrb.Raster2.raw2posB = -0.006874666 -0.009235103 7.646355e-08 1.347985e-07 0.0 0.0

Lrb.Raster2.raw2posT = -0.008090687 0.008872856 8.561695e-08 -1.176589e-07 0.0 0.0

Old Raster Calibrations

Calibration during online analysis

[ 2018-04-12 10:00:00 -0500 ]

Lrb.Raster.raw2posA = -0.00370596 0.00886556 5.01537e-08 -1.2279e-07 0.0 0.0

Lrb.Raster.raw2posB = -0.00589208 0.00713621 6.26247e-08 -9.32498e-08 0.0 0.0

Lrb.Raster.raw2posT = -0.00685467 0.0065481 6.82792e-08 -8.26897e-08 0.0 0.0

[ 2018-04-12 10:00:00 -0500 ]

Lrb.Raster2.raw2posA = -0.00345833 0.00861078 4.73207e-08 -1.22232e-07 0.0 0.0

Lrb.Raster2.raw2posB = -0.00558288 0.00694272 5.90872e-08 -9.28256e-08 0.0 0.0

Lrb.Raster2.raw2posT = -0.00651754 0.00637652 6.44224e-08 -8.23136e-08 0.0 0.0

Calibration #1 by Tyler Hague

- (calibration #1 here):

- done on 18/07/05

- here he fits the carbon hole using run 100023, and forces the center of the hole to be at (0,0)

[ 2018-04-12 10:00:00 -0500 ]

Lrb.Raster.raw2posA = -0.00370596 0.00886556 5.01537e-08 -1.2279e-07 0.0 0.0

Lrb.Raster.raw2posB = -0.00589208 0.00713621 6.26247e-08 -9.32498e-08 0.0 0.0

Lrb.Raster.raw2posT = -0.00621872 0.00755727 8.48732e-08 -1.08002e-07 0.0 0.0

[ 2018-04-12 10:00:00 -0500 ]

Lrb.Raster2.raw2posA = -0.00345833 0.00861078 4.73207e-08 -1.22232e-07 0.0 0.0

Lrb.Raster2.raw2posB = -0.00558288 0.00694272 5.90872e-08 -9.28256e-08 0.0 0.0

Lrb.Raster2.raw2posT = -0.00575922 0.00738865 7.96539e-08 -1.08382e-07 0.0 0.0

Calibration #2 by Tyler Hague

- (calibration #2 here):

- done on 18/07/20

- Here he fits the carbon hole using run 100100. He only uses the radius of the carbon hole to get the slope of the position-current conversion, but he does not force the center of the carbon hole to be at (0,0). Instead, he gets the coordinates of the carbon hole at the target by projecting a line through the position at the BPMs.

[ 2018-04-12 10:00:00 -0500 ]

Lrb.Raster.raw2posA = -0.00307245 0.00835144 4.08794e-08 -1.16358e-07 0.0 0.0

Lrb.Raster.raw2posB = -0.00520763 0.00666433 5.23307e-08 -8.70783e-08 0.0 0.0

Lrb.Raster.raw2posT = -0.00859591 0.0093233 9.15847e-08 -1.21017e-07 0.0 0.0

[ 2018-04-12 10:00:00 -0500 ] Lrb.Raster2.raw2posA = -0.00287198 0.00812136 3.85685e-08 -1.15989e-07 0.0 0.0

Lrb.Raster2.raw2posB = -0.004951 0.00649214 4.93724e-08 -8.68025e-08 0.0 0.0

Lrb.Raster2.raw2posT = -0.00853784 0.00943896 9.19146e-08 -1.25635e-07 0.0 0.0