Difference between revisions of "Tuesday, Aug 6, 2013 11:00am EDT"
From Hall A Wiki
(→Agenda) |
|||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
*Nilanga's questions: | *Nilanga's questions: | ||
| − | ** Given ~75 um position resolution, can we get the required accuracy for MOLLER from 3 GEMs in air, one after the vacuum window, one before the quartz, and one in middle? | + | ** Given ~75 um position resolution, can we get the required accuracy for MOLLER from 3 GEMs in air, one after the vacuum window, one before the quartz, and one in middle? http://ace.phys.virginia.edu/MollerSpectrometer/276 |
** Given 3 z-locations, what should be the dimensions of the GEMs (to capture Moller, ep & enough of the radiative tail)? | ** Given 3 z-locations, what should be the dimensions of the GEMs (to capture Moller, ep & enough of the radiative tail)? | ||
** What are the required resolutions in r and phi? | ** What are the required resolutions in r and phi? | ||
Revision as of 11:03, 6 August 2013
Back to Main Page >> Meetings >> Teleconferences
Logistic information
Phone number: 1-866-740-1260 Access code: 1978431#
Agenda
- Review the cost of tracking assembly for 3 GEM system (KK)
- GEMs and associated electronics
- GEM surface area (covering 25% feasible?)
- support structure
- Nilanga's questions:
- Given ~75 um position resolution, can we get the required accuracy for MOLLER from 3 GEMs in air, one after the vacuum window, one before the quartz, and one in middle? http://ace.phys.virginia.edu/MollerSpectrometer/276
- Given 3 z-locations, what should be the dimensions of the GEMs (to capture Moller, ep & enough of the radiative tail)?
- What are the required resolutions in r and phi?
