Difference between revisions of "SRC ratio results"

From Hall A Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Kin 5.1)
(Kin 5.1)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== Kin 5.1 ==
 
== Kin 5.1 ==
  
* Isospin dependence study (left arm only): (40*Ca-48)/(48*Ca40). Due to the large uncertainty the the Ca-40 thickness, I plotted the +/-10% effect from the thickness of Ca-40. The red data assume that the thicknesses of Ca-40 and Ca-48 are equal.
+
* Isospin dependence study (left arm only): (40*Ca-48)/(48*Ca40). The yields were divided by the thickness (0.5cm*1.55g/cm3) and by the number of nucleons. Due to the large uncertainty the the Ca-40 thickness, I plotted the +/-10% effect from the thickness of Ca-40. The red data assume that the thicknesses of Ca-40 and Ca-48 are equal.
  
 
[[Image:ratio_5.1_leftHRS_Ca.gif]]
 
[[Image:ratio_5.1_leftHRS_Ca.gif]]
 +
 +
* Isospin dependence study (left arm only): Ca-48/Ca40. The yields were divided by the thickness (0.5cm*1.55g/cm3). Due to the large uncertainty the the Ca-40 thickness, I plotted the +/-10% effect from the thickness of Ca-40. The red data assume that the thicknesses of Ca-40 and Ca-48 are equal.
 +
 +
[[Image:ratio_5.1_leftHRS_Ca_bis.gif]]

Revision as of 13:16, 5 May 2011

Kin 5.1

  • Isospin dependence study (left arm only): (40*Ca-48)/(48*Ca40). The yields were divided by the thickness (0.5cm*1.55g/cm3) and by the number of nucleons. Due to the large uncertainty the the Ca-40 thickness, I plotted the +/-10% effect from the thickness of Ca-40. The red data assume that the thicknesses of Ca-40 and Ca-48 are equal.

Ratio 5.1 leftHRS Ca.gif

  • Isospin dependence study (left arm only): Ca-48/Ca40. The yields were divided by the thickness (0.5cm*1.55g/cm3). Due to the large uncertainty the the Ca-40 thickness, I plotted the +/-10% effect from the thickness of Ca-40. The red data assume that the thicknesses of Ca-40 and Ca-48 are equal.

Ratio 5.1 leftHRS Ca bis.gif