Difference between revisions of "SRC ratio results"
From Hall A Wiki
(→Kin 5.1) |
(→Kin 5.1) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Kin 5.1 == | == Kin 5.1 == | ||
− | * Isospin dependence study (left arm only): (40*Ca-48)/(48*Ca40). The yields were divided by the thickness (0.5cm*1.55g/cm3) and by the number of nucleons. Due to the large uncertainty the the Ca-40 thickness, I plotted the +/-10% effect from the thickness of Ca-40. The red data assume that the thicknesses of Ca-40 and Ca-48 are equal. | + | * Isospin dependence study (left arm only): (40*Ca-48)/(48*Ca40). The yields were divided by the charge, the thickness (0.5cm*1.55g/cm3) and by the number of nucleons. Due to the large uncertainty the the Ca-40 thickness, I plotted the +/-10% effect from the thickness of Ca-40. The red data assume that the thicknesses of Ca-40 and Ca-48 are equal. |
[[Image:ratio_5.1_leftHRS_Ca.gif]] | [[Image:ratio_5.1_leftHRS_Ca.gif]] | ||
− | * Isospin dependence study (left arm only): Ca-48/Ca40. The yields were divided by the thickness (0.5cm*1.55g/cm3). Due to the large uncertainty the the Ca-40 thickness, I plotted the +/-10% effect from the thickness of Ca-40. The red data assume that the thicknesses of Ca-40 and Ca-48 are equal. | + | * Isospin dependence study (left arm only): Ca-48/Ca40. The yields were divided by the charge and the thickness (0.5cm*1.55g/cm3). Due to the large uncertainty the the Ca-40 thickness, I plotted the +/-10% effect from the thickness of Ca-40. The red data assume that the thicknesses of Ca-40 and Ca-48 are equal. |
[[Image:ratio_5.1_leftHRS_Ca_bis.gif]] | [[Image:ratio_5.1_leftHRS_Ca_bis.gif]] |
Revision as of 13:22, 5 May 2011
Kin 5.1
- Isospin dependence study (left arm only): (40*Ca-48)/(48*Ca40). The yields were divided by the charge, the thickness (0.5cm*1.55g/cm3) and by the number of nucleons. Due to the large uncertainty the the Ca-40 thickness, I plotted the +/-10% effect from the thickness of Ca-40. The red data assume that the thicknesses of Ca-40 and Ca-48 are equal.
- Isospin dependence study (left arm only): Ca-48/Ca40. The yields were divided by the charge and the thickness (0.5cm*1.55g/cm3). Due to the large uncertainty the the Ca-40 thickness, I plotted the +/-10% effect from the thickness of Ca-40. The red data assume that the thicknesses of Ca-40 and Ca-48 are equal.