Difference between revisions of "Thursday, November 10, 4:00pm ETD"
From Hall A Wiki
(New page: == Agenda == Presentations:<br><br> * Should we stop dividing our efforts between GEMC and mollersim? ** Are we ready to choose one, and if so, which? ** [https://userweb.jlab.org/~crowder...) |
(→Agenda) |
||
(9 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Agenda == | == Agenda == | ||
Presentations:<br><br> | Presentations:<br><br> | ||
− | * | + | * Updates to mollersim geometry (Juliette) |
− | ** | + | ** rotated the phi-defining collimator so that there is a closed section to beam left |
− | ** [ | + | ** modified field determination code to be somewhat general - can rotate the field easily now |
+ | ** coded the upstream torus in GDML (see [http://ace.phys.virginia.edu/MollerSpectrometer/202 elog 202]) | ||
+ | *** plan to also hard-code to maintain the ability to continue to use it - but I REALLY like the GDML | ||
+ | *** will compare the results for hard-coded vs. GDML defined | ||
+ | *** the GDML write from GEANT4 did NOT create tesselated volumes, but the parameterization is lost | ||
+ | *** if we code directly in GDML it is really easy to parameterize things AND to modularize things (see [http://ace.phys.virginia.edu/MollerSpectrometer/205 elog 205]) | ||
+ | * Changing code to write volume numbers of sensitive volumes to root file - need a better way of identifying them? | ||
+ | ** 0-999 for actual detectors (possibly 0-99 for plane detectors and 100-999 for pieces quartz?, tracking?) | ||
+ | ** 1000-1999 for collimators | ||
+ | ** 2000-???? for coils | ||
+ | *Incidentally, no luck with GEANT4 with GDML on windows - Mauri is working on a Fedora 15 package and I now have a Fedora 15 virtual machine | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
* Collimator/field configuration comparison update (Sereres) | * Collimator/field configuration comparison update (Sereres) | ||
− | * | + | **[http://ace.phys.virginia.edu/MollerSpectrometer/208 Plots of asymmetries] |
− | * | + | **[http://ace.phys.virginia.edu/MollerSpectrometer/206 target study] |
− | + | **[http://ace.phys.virginia.edu/MollerSpectrometer/207 comparing moller, ep, inelastics] | |
− | + | ||
− | * | + | |
− | * | + | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | ** [ | + | |
== Minutes == | == Minutes == |
Latest revision as of 17:06, 10 November 2011
Agenda
Presentations:
- Updates to mollersim geometry (Juliette)
- rotated the phi-defining collimator so that there is a closed section to beam left
- modified field determination code to be somewhat general - can rotate the field easily now
- coded the upstream torus in GDML (see elog 202)
- plan to also hard-code to maintain the ability to continue to use it - but I REALLY like the GDML
- will compare the results for hard-coded vs. GDML defined
- the GDML write from GEANT4 did NOT create tesselated volumes, but the parameterization is lost
- if we code directly in GDML it is really easy to parameterize things AND to modularize things (see elog 205)
- Changing code to write volume numbers of sensitive volumes to root file - need a better way of identifying them?
- 0-999 for actual detectors (possibly 0-99 for plane detectors and 100-999 for pieces quartz?, tracking?)
- 1000-1999 for collimators
- 2000-???? for coils
- Incidentally, no luck with GEANT4 with GDML on windows - Mauri is working on a Fedora 15 package and I now have a Fedora 15 virtual machine
- Collimator/field configuration comparison update (Sereres)
Minutes
Return to Teleconferences
Return to MOLLER at 11 GeV E09-005