Difference between revisions of "Thursday, October 20, 2:00pm ETD"

Revision as of 16:59, 10 November 2011

Presentations:

Should we stop dividing our efforts between GEMC and mollersim?
- Are we ready to choose one, and if so, which?
- Dustin's talk

Feature	GEMC	mollersim
nice GUI	yes	not yet
nice visualization (Qt)	yes	yes
geometry (w/o recompile)	yes - mysql DB, filled by PERL scripts	yes, messengers or GDML
detector response	yes	want to customize?
ROOT output	translate EVIO output, you have to write the bank configuration	yes
ease of installation (on jlab systems)	RPM available, OSX available? DEB in the works	not yet - necessary? possible?
maintenance	wider range of users to test (find bugs, etc.)	only collaboration using
control	not really - have to coordinate with Mauri for changes, etc.	yes

GEANT4 on windows (Juliette)
- works with OpenGL and HepRep Viewers
- have installed Qt, Xerces, and ROOT -> need to set environment to run mollersim
Qweak GEANT4 development/use is ramping up again (Wouter)
Other items
- Meetings?
  - Thursday at 2pm or 4pm depending on Qweak meeting time, in F224/225
  - no"major" simulation meeting (teleconference)
  - collaboration meeting in January
- Other projects

@@ Line 47: / Line 47: @@
 * Collimator/field configuration comparison update (Sereres)
+[http://ace.phys.virginia.edu/MollerSpectrometer/206 target study]
+[http://ace.phys.virginia.edu/MollerSpectrometer/207 comparing moller, ep, inelastics]
+[http://ace.phys.virginia.edu/MollerSpectrometer/208 asymmetries]
 * GEANT4 on windows (Juliette)
 ** works with OpenGL and HepRep Viewers