Difference between revisions of "Thursday, November 10, 4:00pm ETD"
From Hall A Wiki
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
* Updates to mollersim (geometry) | * Updates to mollersim (geometry) | ||
** rotated the phi-defining collimator so that there is a closed section to beam left | ** rotated the phi-defining collimator so that there is a closed section to beam left | ||
| + | ** modified field determination code to be somewhat general - can rotate the field easily now | ||
** coded the upstream torus in GDML (see [http://ace.phys.virginia.edu/MollerSpectrometer/202 elog 202]) | ** coded the upstream torus in GDML (see [http://ace.phys.virginia.edu/MollerSpectrometer/202 elog 202]) | ||
| − | *** | + | *** plan to also hard-code to maintain the ability to use hard-coded geometry |
| + | *** will compare the results for hard-coded vs. GDML defined | ||
| + | *** if we code directly in GDML it is really easy to parameterize things AND to modularize things | ||
* Collimator/field configuration comparison update (Sereres) | * Collimator/field configuration comparison update (Sereres) | ||
| + | ** Plots of asymmetries | ||
| + | ** Plots of ee/ep separation and peak widths | ||
== Minutes == | == Minutes == | ||
Revision as of 10:47, 9 November 2011
Agenda
Presentations:
- Updates to mollersim (geometry)
- rotated the phi-defining collimator so that there is a closed section to beam left
- modified field determination code to be somewhat general - can rotate the field easily now
- coded the upstream torus in GDML (see elog 202)
- plan to also hard-code to maintain the ability to use hard-coded geometry
- will compare the results for hard-coded vs. GDML defined
- if we code directly in GDML it is really easy to parameterize things AND to modularize things
- Collimator/field configuration comparison update (Sereres)
- Plots of asymmetries
- Plots of ee/ep separation and peak widths
Minutes
Return to Teleconferences
Return to MOLLER at 11 GeV E09-005
